Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Aug;96(8):599–608. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001408

Table 1:

Distribution of custom retinal nerve fiber layer and total retinal thickness values

Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Median (Interquartile Range), µm Total Retinal Thickness Median (Interquartile Range), µm
Conventional (1.73 mm radius) BMO to 250 µm 250 to 500 µm 500 to 1000 µm 1000 to 1500 µm Within BMO BMO to 250 µm 250 to 500 µm 500 to 1000 µm 1000 to 1500 µm
Control (n = 42) 91.0 (86–96) 168.6 (134–183) 143 (125–156) 105 (100–114) 78.1 (76–83) 201.7 (88–297) 331.8 (297–374) 330.6 (311–348) 312.5 (298–323) 293.7 (285–306)
PE (n = 21) 128.7* (102–207) 306.2* (262–424) 227.3* (205–342) 130.5* (122–191) 88.1* (82–103) 710.2* (568–911) 612* (517–771) 461.8* (431–585) 351.8* (336–416) 297.4 (289–314)
Mild PE (n = 15) 109.9 (100–132) 293.6 (260–377) 218 (204–276) 127.6 (120–147) 85.6 (81–90) 618.8 (516–786) 529.8 (503–631) 432.4 (425–498) 341.1 (332–366) 295.5 (285–299)
PPE (n = 27) 102* (87–107) 213* (177–262) 162* (140–198) 114.1 (100–124) 79.4 (74–88) 548.7* (396–703) 459.1* (418–538) 381.5* (356–410) 322.8 (308–336) 285.1* (274–293)

BMO = Bruch’s membrane opening; PE = papilledema; PPE = pseudopapilledema;

*

Comparison with control is statistically significant (P < 0.0125). For mild PE, only statistical comparison with PPE was performed.

Comparison with PPE is statistically significant (P < 0.0125).