Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Aug;96(8):599–608. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001408

Table 2:

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis

PE (All Grades, n = 21) vs. PPE (n = 27) Mild PE (n = 15) vs. PPE (n = 27)
AUC Analysis At 95% Specificity AUC Analysis At 95% Specificity
AUC ± SE P-value* Sensitivity Cutoff Value (µm) AUC ± SE P-value* Sensitivity Cutoff Value (µm)
Conventional (1.73 mm radius) RNFLT 0.78 ± 0.07 N/A 0.33 159.3 0.70 ± 0.09 N/A 0.067 161.4
RNFL250 0.84 ± 0.06 0.42 0.48 369.7 0.80 ± 0.07 < 0.0001 0.33 369.7
TRT250 0.85 ± 0.06 0.34 0.43 653.9 0.79 ± 0.07 0.34 0.20 657.9
MRW 0.82 ± 0.06 < 0.0001 0.43 645.7 0.76 ± 0.08 < 0.0001 0.20 646.5
BMO Height 0.90 ± 0.04 < 0.0001 0.57 −14.2 0.89 ± 0.05 < 0.0001 0.53 −14.2

PE = papilledema; PPE = pseudopapilledema; AUC = area under the curve; SE = standard error; RNFLT = retinal nerve fiber layer thickness; RNFL250 = RNFLT from BMO to 250 µm; TRT250 = total retinal thickness from BMO to 250 µm; MRW = minimum rim width; BMO = Bruch’s membrane opening

*

P-value comparing AUC to standard RNFL thickness AUC