Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019 May-Jun;43(3):452–459. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000862

TABLE 4.

Differences Between the Observed ASCVD and the ASCVDs Predicted by Models 1 and 2

95% Limits of Agreement
Bias Lower Upper
Observed ASCVD vs ASCVD predicted by model 1 (semiautomated approach, continuous imaging features) −1.954 ± 10.88 −23.29 19.38
Observed ASCVD vs ASCVD predicted by model 2 (semiautomated approach, dichotomized imaging features) −1.466 ± 12.04 −25.06 22.13
ASCVD predicted by model 1 vs ASCVD predicted by model 2 0.488 ± 5.88 −11.04 12.01