Table 6.
The average scores of assessment of climate change mitigation policies according three criteria obtained by expert panel in Lithuania
Source: created by authors
| Policies | Energy efficiency improvement | Penetration of RES | GHG emission reduction | Energy poverty reduction | Overall impact, Sum of all scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lithuania | |||||
| Policies to promote energy renovation of residential buildings | |||||
| Experts from business field (4 respondents) | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.7 |
| Expert from state administration (4 respondents) | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3.5 |
| Expert from academia (4 respondents) | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.3 |
| Mean | 3.7 | 3 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| Policies to promote micro-generation technologies in residential buildings | |||||
| Experts from business field (4 respondents) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 |
| Expert from state administration (4 respondents) | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3.5 |
| Expert from academia (4 respondents) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Mean | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 2.3 |
| Policies to promote other energy efficiency improvements in households | |||||
| Experts from business field (4 respondents) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1.5 |
| Expert from state administration (4 respondents) | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 |
| Expert from academia (4 respondents) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1.8 |
| Mean | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |