Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 15;11:625220. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.625220

Table 1.

Patients’ characteristics of primary and validation cohorts.

Characteristics Whole cohort (n=136) Primary cohort (n=90) Validation cohort (n=46) P-value
Gender
 Male 101 (74.3%) 70 (77.8%) 31 (67.4%) 0.19
 Female 35 (25.7%) 20 (22.2%) 15 (32.6%)
Age (year) 54.169 ± 11.765 53.578 ± 11.237 55.236 ± 12.786 0.414
Peritumoral edema
 Negative 91 (66.9%) 62 (68.9%) 29 (63.0%) 0.493
 Positive 45 (33.1%) 28 (31.1%) 17 (37.0%)
Tumor size
 <2cm 18 (13.2%) 11 (12.2%) 7 (15.2%) 0.444
 2-5cm 95 (69.9%) 66 (73.3%) 29 (63.1%)
 >5cm 23 (16.9%) 13 (14.5%) 10 (21.7%)
Location
 Parasinoidal 37 (27.2%) 23 (25.6%) 14 (30.4%) 0.741
 Facies convexa 28 (20.6%) 19 (21.1%) 9 (19.6%)
 Skull base 24 (17.6%) 18 (20.0%) 6 (13.0%)
 Others 47 (34.6%) 30 (33.3%) 17 (37.0%)
Hypertension
 Negative 113 (83.1%) 74 (82.2%) 39 (84.8%) 0.706
 Positive 23 (16.9%) 16 (17.8%) 7 (15.2%)
Diabetes
 Negative 132 (97.1%) 86 (95.6%) 46 (100%) 0.147
 Positive 4 (2.9%) 4 (4.4%) 0 (0%)
Epilepsy
 Negative 134 (98.5%) 89 (98.9%) 45 (97.8%) 0.626
 Positive 2 (1.5%) 1 (1.1%) 1 (2.2%)
Cerebral edema exacerbation
 Negative 76 (55.9%) 55 (61.1%) 21 (45.7%) 0.086
 Positive 60 (44.1%) 35 (38.9%) 25 (54.3%)

Categorical variables were presented as the number (percentage). Continuous variables consistent with a normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation, otherwise the median and quartile are used. Chi-Square or Fisher Exact tests, as appropriate, were used to compare the differences in categorical variables, while the independent sample t-test was used to compare the differences in continuous variables.