Table 2.
Survivorship of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
|
Ref.
|
Number of UKA
|
Type of implant
|
Mean follow-up (yr)
|
Survivorship (number of revisions)
|
| Scott and Santore[6] (1981) | 12 | Cemented, all poly tibia | 3.5 (2-6) | 83% at 3.5 yr (2) |
| Marmor[47] (1984) | 14 | Cemented, all poly tibia | 7.4 (2.5-9.83) | NA (2) |
| Gunther et al[48] (1996) | 53 | Cemented, metal-backed, mobile-bearing | 5 (2.5-9.83) | 82% at 5 yr (11) |
| Ohdera et al[49] (2001) | 18 | Four different designs | 8.25 (5-15.75) | NA (2) |
| Ashraf et al[33] (2002) | 83 | Cemented all poly tibia | 9 (2-21) | 74% at 15 yr (15) |
| O'Rourke et al[50] (2005) | 14 | Cemented all poly tibia | 24 (17-28) | 72% at 25 yr (2) |
| Swienckowski and Pennington[23] (2004) | 29 | Cemented, metal-backed (75%); all poly tibia (25%) | 12.4 (3.1-15.6) | 100% at 12.4 yr (0) |
| Sah and Scott[24] (2007) | 49 | Three different designs | 5.2 (2-14) | 100% at 5.4 yr (0) |
| Argenson et al[16] (2008) | 38 | Four different designs | 12.6 (3-23) | 84% at 16 yr (5) |
| Lustig et al[43] (2011) | 54 | Cemented, all poly tibia | 8.4 (5-16) | 98% at 10 yr (1) |
| Lustig et al[34] (2012) | 13 | Three different designs | 10.2 (3-22.1) | 100% at 5 yr; 80% at 15 yr (3) |
| Heyse et al[44] (2012) | 50 | Full poly, metal-backed cemented, metal-backed uncemented | 10.8 (5-16) | 91.8% at 10 and 15 yr |
| Fornell et al[45] (2018) | 41 | Cemented, metal-backed, mobile bearing design | 4.1 (2-7) | 97.5% at 5 yr |
| Zambianchi et al[46] (2020) | 67 | Fixed bearing metal backed design | 3 | 100% at 3 yr (0) |
UKA: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; NA: Not available.