Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 29;10:59. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00844-1

Table 3.

Susceptibility of Mycobacterium abscessus and M. massiliense to antimicrobial agents determined by the broth dilution method

Grouping/species Mycobacterium abscessus complex (N = 114) M. abscessus (n = 67) M. massiliense (n = 45)
Antimicrobial agent S (%) I (%) R (%) S (%) I (%) R (%) S (%) I (%) R (%)
Amikacin 94.74 1.75 3.51 92.54 1.49 5.97 100.00 0.00 0.00
Clarithromycin (3D) 85.09 0.00 14.91 82.09 0.00 17.91 91.11 0.00 8.89
Clarithromycin (14D) 42.98 2.63 54.39 13.43 2.99 83.58a 86.67 2.22 11.11a
Imipenem 0.00 1.75 98.25 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 2.22 97.78
Linezolid 32.46 34.21 33.33 29.85 34.33 35.82 35.56 35.56 28.89
Cefoxitin 4.39 78.95 16.67 4.48 76.12 19.40 4.44 84.44 11.11
Tobramycin 11.40 12.28 76.32 8.96 10.45 80.60 13.33 15.56 71.11
Doxycycline 1.75 0.00 98.25 1.49 0.00 98.51 2.22 0.00 97.78
Moxifloxacin 2.63 1.75 95.61 1.49 1.49 97.01 2.22 0.00 97.78
Ciprofloxacin 5.26 0.88 93.86 5.97 0.00 94.03 4.44 0.00 95.56
Tigecycline - - - - - - - - -
TMP‒SMX 2.63 - 97.37 2.99 - 97.01 2.22 0.00 97.78

RGM rapid growing mycobacteria, TMP‒SMX trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, CLSI Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

aSignificant difference between M. abscessus and M. massiliense was observed in resistance rate to clarithromycin (P < 0.01)