Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 15;12:626021. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.626021

Table 2.

PEDro scores.

References PEDro item
1a 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Total
Boggio et al. (43) Yes 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
Fleming et al. (44) Yes 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 6
Fregni et al. (46) No 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Hesse et al. (45) Yes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Khedr et al. (53) Yes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Kim et al. (47) Yes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 9
Nair et al. (48) Yes 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 8
Nicolo et al. (49) Yes 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9
Rocha et al. (50) Yes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Stagg et al. (51) Yes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 6
Zimerman et al. (52) Yes 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Total number of studies 11 5 10 16 6 9 9 9 11 11
a

Not included in the total score.

PEDro items: 1, eligibility criteria specified; 2, participants randomly allocated to groups; 3, allocation concealed; 4, groups similar at baseline; 5, participants were blinded; 6, therapists were blinded; 7, assessors were blinded; 8, data available for more than 85% of participants; 9, participants received the treatment as allocated or intention-to-treat analysis was used; 10, statistical analyses were reported; 11, point measures and variability of data reported; 0, no; 1, yes.