Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 28;17(2):165–174. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_154_19

Table 4.

Comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted surgery

Study Country (years) Sample size Lower rectum (%) Pre-operative CCRT (%) Conversion rate (%) Estimated blood loss (mL) (median) Overall complications (%) Anastomotic leakage (%) Rate of sphincter preservation (%) DRM (cm) (median) Positive CRM (%)
Present study Taiwan (2019) 156 (Stage 0-III) 62.8 71.8 0 75 (15-1050) 19.8 5.1 97.4 1.8 1.3
126 (age<70) 59.5 71.4 0 100 (15-1050) 20.6 5.6 97.6 1.8 1.6
30 (age≥70) 76.7 73.3 0 50 (15-350) 16.7 3.3 96.7 1.75 0
Park et al.[52] Korea (2015) 133 (yp Stage I-III) 24.8 11.3 0 77.6 (0-700) 19.7 4.5 100 2.75 6.8
Ghezzi et al.[53] Brazil/Italy (2014) 65 (yp Stage 0-III) 100 72.3 1.5 0 (0-175) 41.5 7.1 86.2 2.7 0
Cho et al.[54] Korea (2012) 278 (yp Stage 0-III) 24.8 32.7 0.4 179.0 25.9 10.4 100 2.0 5
Park et al.[55] Korea (2011) 52 (yp Stage 0-III) 60.4 (<7 cm) 23.1 0 NA 19.2 9.6 100 2.8 1.9
Baek et al.[14] Korea (2011) 41 (yp Stage 0-III) 36.6 (<7 cm) 80.5 7.3 200 (20-2000) 22.0 7.3 85.4 3.6 2.4

CCRT: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, CRM: Circumferential resection margin, DRM: Distal resection margin, NA: Not applicable