Table A.1.
Overview of the 16 scientific opinions issued by the MS national bodies and used in this report. The ‘opinion number’ is used in the underlying report as a reference. For all opinions, it is indicated what type of NGT is mentioned by a ‘yes’ in the table. The use of a specific SDN is indicated if applicable. For more details, see Appendix A in Van der Vlugt (2021)
| Opinion Number | Identifier given by EFSA | Title of report | Author | New Genomic Technique | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDN‐1 | SDN‐2 | SDN‐3 | ODM | Cisgenesis intragenesis | RdDM | Grafting | Reverse breeding | Agro‐infiltration | Base editing | ||||
| 1 | AT_2012 | Cisgenesis ‐ A report on the practical consequences of the application of novel techniques in plant breeding | Bundesministerium für Gesundheit | ZFN | ZFN | ZFN | yes | yes | – | – | – | yes | – |
| 2 | AT_2013 | New plant breeding techniques | Bundesministerium für Gesundheit | – | – | – | – | – | yes | yes | yes | – | – |
| 3 | AT_2017 | RNAi‐based techniques, accelerated breeding and CRISPR‐Cas: basics and application in plant breeding | Bundesministerium für Gesundheit | yes | yes | yes | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 4 | BE_2016 | Advice of the Biosafety and Biotechnology Unit (SBB) concerning genome editing in plants using the CRISPR/Cas system | Wetenschappelijk Instituut Volksgezondheid WIV‐ISP | CRISPR | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5 | BE_2019 | Advice of the Belgian Biosafety Advisory Council on notification B/BE/19/V1 (maize) from VIB under Directive 2001/18/EC | Biosafety Advisory Council | CRISPR | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 6 | DK_2019 | Induced genetic variation in crop plants by random or targeted mutagenesis: convergence and differences | Dept of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Denmark | yes | yes | – | yes | – | – | – | – | – | yes |
| 7 | ES_2019 | National Biosafety Commission Report on the site directed mutagenesis (“gene editing”) | Ministerio Para La Transición Ecolológica | yes | yes | yes | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 8 | FR_2017 | Scientific opinion on new plant breeding techniques | Haut Conseil des Biotechnologies | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | – | yes | – |
| 9 | 8_1_DE_2019 | ‘Genetic engineering ‐ public hearing | Federal Agency for Nature Conservtion (BfN) | yes | yes | yes | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 10 | 9_2_DE_2019 | Genome editing | Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit | yes | yes | yes | yes | – | – | – | – | – | yes |
| 11 | 10_3_DE_2018 | Scientific report on new techniques in plant breeding and animal breeding and their uses in food and agriculture | Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (bvl) | yes | yes | yes | yes | – | – | – | – | – | yes |
| 12 | 11_DK_2020 | Comments from DTU on studies of the risk arising from the new mutagenesis techniques | National Food Institute at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU Food) | yes | yes | yes | yes | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 13 | 14_NL_2014 | CRISPR‐Cas advisory report ‐ Revolution from the lab | Commissie Genetische Modificatie (COGEM) | CRISPR | CRISPR | CRISPR | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 14 | 15_NL_2017 | Advisory opinion on CRISPR‐Cas and directed mutagenesis in plants | Commissie Genetische Modificatie (COGEM) | CRISPR | CRISPR | – | yes | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 15 | 16_NL_2019 | Advisory opinion on the Dutch proposal for the exemption of certain GM plants | Commissie Genetische Modificatie (COGEM) | – | – | – | yes | yes | – | – | yes | yes | – |
| 16 | 17_LT_2019 | Analysis of new gene modification techniques or methods | UAB Caszyme, Vilnius | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | – | yes | yes |