Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 12;47(3):695–711. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa182

Table 3.

Characteristics of the Articles Included in the Meta-analysis

Sample Study N % Men Age Education (y) Illness duration (y) Age at onset % Sz % Sz affective Functional domains and aspects ToM tasks
1 Achim et al22 31 84 24.9 - 1.9 - 74 1 Global (FO) COST
2 Bambini et al59 43 62 39.7 11.8 15.5 24.5 100 - Global (FO) PST
3 Bechi et al60 79 62 40.9 - - 23.6 100 - Global (FO); IADL (FP) RMET
4 Bechi et al61 30 47 37.7 11.3 12.5 25.5 100 - IADL (FP) PST
5 Bell et al27 151 58 42.8 13.2 - 22.6 69 31 PA (FO); SF (FO) Hinting
6 Bora et al29 50 66 30.6 11.5 9.1 21.4 100 - Global (FO); IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) Hinting; RMET
7 Brown et al34 45 51 36.2 11.1 12.2 - 100 IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) Hinting; RMET
8 Brüne et al62 50 44 39.2 - 9.9 29.3 76 18 Global (FO) FB; PST
9 Brüne et al63 69 65 36.3 - 10.6 25.9 84 16 Global (FO) PST
10 Cavieres et al64 42 67 24.3 - - - 100 - Global (FO) Basic and complex emotions
11 Chen et al35 53 77 42.3 - 21.3 - 100 - IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) FP; RMET; Strange stories
12 Cook et al65 43 67 42.2 12.9 - - 47 28 Global (FO) Hinting
13 Couture et al23 178 64 45.9 12.2 - - 100 - Global (FO); PA (FP) Hinting
14 Davidson et al66 48 58 51.0 12.3 - 21.2 77 13 Global (FO) Comic strips; Hinting; RMET; TASIT-III; ToM PST
15 Fiszdon et al30 119 65 44.9 12.9 9.6 22.7 69 31 Global (FO); IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) Hinting
16 Fox et al67 28 64 33.2 - 14.6 - 100 - SF (FP) TASIT-III
17 Galderisi et al68 740 70 40.0 11.7 16.4 24.1 100 - IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO); IADL (FP) TASIT-III
18 Giusti et al69 20 70 36.2 13.4 11.6 - 100 - Global (FO) RMET; Strange stories
19 Green et al70 191 68 46.6 12.7 24.2 - 91 1 Global (FO); IADL (FP) TASIT-III
20 Greenwood et al71 43 51 39.5 - - - 100 - IADL (FP) Comic strips
21 Hajduk et al72 43 60 38.2 - 11.3 - 72 28 Global (FO); IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) Hinting
22a Harvey et al73* 103 64 42.6 12.5 - - -** - SF (FO) Hinting; RMET; TASIT-III
22b Harvey et al73* 209 63 41.6 13.1 - - -** - SF (FO) Hinting; RMET; TASIT-III
23 Horan et al36 55 76 22.3 12.7 0.9 - 100 - IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) TASIT-III
24 Horton et al74 34 62 45.0 - 18.0 - 76 24 Global (FO) Hinting
25 Johannesen et al75 32 59 48.8 12.7 - - 100 - IADL (FO) Hinting; SAT-MC; TASIT-III
26 Jung et al76 56 55 33.4 15.2 11.2 - 73 16 Global (FO) FB; MTSS
27 Kalin et al77 179 65 42.1 12.7 - - 54 46 SF (FO); SF (FP) Hinting; RMET; TASIT-III
28 Kanie et al78 52 54 38.1 13.7 13.2 - 100 - Global (FO); IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) SCSQ
29 Kern et al79 50 63 34.5 13.9 - - 100 - Global (FO); IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) TASIT-III
30 Konstantakopoulos et al80 52 60 42.0 11.5 17.4 - 100 - Global (FO) FP
31 Kosmidis et al81 28 79 36.9 12.4 10.9 26.0 100 - SF (FP) Cartoon stories; Verbal stories
32 Langdon et al82 23 96 20.9 11.4 0.9 19.9 91 0.1 Global (FO) PST
33 Le et al83 146 68 41.5 12.3 - - 80 20 Global (FO) Hinting
34 Lee et al84 55 49 41.4 11.2 12.9 28.5 100 - SF (FO) Cartoon stories
35 Lincoln et al85 75 63 33.9 14.9 10.0 - 88 12 SF (FO) FB; MTSS
36 Lo & Siu86 30 53 41.6 9.0 - 24.3 100 - Global (FP); IADL (FP); PA (FP); SF (FP) SCSQ
37 Lo & Siu33 62 45 37.9 10.7 12.0 25.9 100 - Global (FP); IADL (FP); PA (FP); SF (FP) SCSQ
38 Ludwig et al87 38 87 23.5 14.0 - - 66 16 Global (FO); IADL (FP); SF (FP) Hinting; RMET; TASIT-III
39 Martinez-Dominguez et al28 21 71 39.2 16.1 13.3 - 100 - Global (FO); IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) Hinting; RMET
40 Mathews & Barch88 40 65 36.8 13.1 - 19.0 75 25 Global (FO); IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) TASIT-III
41 Mazza et al89 49 67 26.4 12.6 1.0 - 100 - Global (FO) Advanced ToM
42 McGlade et al90 73 67 41.4 13.6 18.2 - 77 23 Global (FP) RMET
43 Mehl et al91 55 54 32.1 15.1 9.6 - 78 15 SF (FO); SF (FP) MTSS
44 Mehta et al92 60 70 33.3 13.0 8.1 - 88 12 Global (FO) SOCRATIS
45 Murphy93 30 100 37.4 - 13.1 - 100 - Global (FO) MAT; RMET
46 Oh et al94 42 55 35.8 12.4 7.6 - 100 - Global (FO); IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) SAT-MC
47 Pijnenborg et al95 46 74 27.4 4.8 7.0 24.2 100 - Global (FO) FP
48 Pinkham & Penn96 49 57 33.2 14.3 10.4 - 71 25 SF (FP) Hinting; ToM vignette
49 Pinkham et al97 218 65 41.7 13.0 - - 51 49 Global (FO); IADL (FP); SF (FP) Hinting; RMET; SAT-MC; TASIT-III
50 Piovan et al98 30 63 45.4 9.6 16.0 29.4 100 - Global (FO) PST
51 Riccardi et al99 30 70 37.8 9.9 13.9 - 100 - Global (FO) Visual jokes
52 Robertson et al100 216 74 40.7 - 17.1 - 100 - Global (FO) Hinting; RMET
53 Roncone et al16 44 77 33.4 11.6 10.7 - 77 1 Global (FO); IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) ToM stories
54 Smith et al101 60 63 35.4 - 14.4 - 100 - Global (FO); SF (FP) EPTT
55 Tas et al102 28 46 34.1 11.2 11.4 - 100 - IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) Hinting; RMET
56 Tso et al103 33 67 38.5 13.8 3.9 11.8 100 - Global (FO) RMET
57 Valaparla et al104 51 43 32.4 12.2 5.5 26.7 100 - Global (FO); IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) SOCRATIS
58 Weijers et al105 87 64 31.7 - 5.7 - 63 14 Global (FO) Hinting
59 Zhu et al106 40 45 30.2 10.7 6.8 - 100 - Global (FO); IADL (FO); PA (FO); SF (FO) FP
Characteristics of the overall participants across all studies (means and standard deviations are presented) 4369 65.0 38.9 (10.1) 12.4 (2.6) 13.5 (8.9) 24.2 (7.6) 87.5 10.9

Note: SZ, Schizophrenia; SZaffective, Schizoaffective. IADL, Instrumental activities of daily living; PA, Productive activities; SF, Social functioning; Global, Global functioning; FO, Functional outcome; FP, Functional performance; COST, Combined Stories Test; PST, Picture Sequencing Task; RMET, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test; Hinting, Hinting task; FB, False belief task; FP, Faux-Pas task; ToM PST, Theory of Mind Picture Stories Task; TASIT-III, The Awareness of Social Inference Test; SAT-MC, The Social Attribution Task-Multiple Choice; MTSS, Movie Task of Social Situation; SCSQ, Social Cognition and Screening Questionnaire; SOCRATIS, Social Cognition Rating Tools in Indian Setting; MAT, Modified Advanced theory of mind test; EPTT, Emotional Perspective Taking Task.

*Harvey et al (2019) include participants from the study of Pinkham et al (2018). To avoid overlap of the samples, only data from Pinkham et al (2018) were used to calculate sociodemographic information. Harvey et al (2019) however provided correlations between ToM and social functioning that were used for the analyses since they provided distinct information.

**Diagnoses are provided for the whole group, but not detailed for the subgroups, but include only patients with SZ or SZaffective.