Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 30;47(2):82–90. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.2.82

Table 5.

Influence of impression method on distortion of the impression, recording of maxillary tuberosity, cyanosis, and patient crying

Parameter Group I Group II
Distortion of the cleft lip and palate impression 17 (56.7) 0 (0)
Maxillary tuberosity recording 10 (33.3) 30 (100)
Cyanosis/choking 5 (16.7) 0 (0)
Crying 30 (100) 30 (100)

Values are presented as number (%).

Group I: finger technique, Group II: specialized acrylic tray (cleftray).