Table 2.
Beneficial microbial categorization in five rice soil samples of Karnataka
| Sampled district | CDM (%) | HDM (%) | OMD (%) | Nfixers (%) | Nfiers (%) | PS (%) | PM (%) | PGPR (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHM | 17.12 (8155) | 16.60 (7905) | 16.60 (7905) | 3.22 (1532) | 0.44 (208) | 14.73 (7018) | 0.10 (50) | 14.29 (6807) |
| DVG | 14.87 (1663) | 13.77 (1540) | 13.78 (1541) | 10.71 (1198) | 1.00 (112) | 12.57 (1405) | 0.80 (90) | 11.56 (1293) |
| HSN | 20.07 (5303) | 19.69 (5203) | 19.70 (5204) | 2.04 (540) | 0.11 (29) | 12.46 (3291) | 0.90 (238) | 12.14 (3207) |
| MND | 15.47 (686) | 12.90 (572) | 12.92 (573) | 10.80 (479) | 1.29 (57) | 14.09 (625) | 1.67 (74) | 11.95 (530) |
| GVT | 27.87 (6967) | 27.26 (6815) | 27.26 (6815) | 0.84 (211) | 0.03 (8) | 5.62 (1404) | 0.13 (32) | 5.43 (1358) |
CHM Chamarajnagara, DVG davangere, HSN hassan, MND mandya, GVT gangavathi, CDM cellulose degrading microbes, HDM hemicellulose degrading microbes, OMD organic matter decomposers, Nfixers nitrogen fixers, Nfiers nitrifiers, PS phosphorous solubilizers, PM phosphorous mobilizers, PGPR plant growth producing rhizobacteria