Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 29;11:9275. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88543-7

Table 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the model for detecting neovascular AMD and classifying RAP and PCV OCT images.

Normal vs. neovascular AMDa
Predicted normal Predicted wet AMD
Actual normal 421 4
Actual neovascular AMDa 3 365
RAP vs. PCV
Predicted PCV Predicted RAP
Actual PCV 183 23
Actual RAPb 20 169

Neovascular AMD, neovascular age-related macular degeneration; RAP, retinal angiomatous proliferation; PCV, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; OCT, optical coherence tomography.

aThe sensitivity of the classifier for detecting wet AMD eyes was 99.2%, the specificity was 99.1%, and the accuracy was 99.1%.

bThe sensitivity of the classifier for detecting RAP was 89.4%, the specificity was 88.8%, and the accuracy was 89.1%.