Table 6.

Phytoseiid validation. Buryn and Brandl (1992) values added for comparison from Table 8

Source	Feeding group	Species	DPFD/VPMD	VR	p (worm-like feeding)	F2AV	Aspect ratio
Adar et al. (2012)	Generalist	Amblyseius largoensis	0.903	0.472	0.672
Adar et al. (2012)	Generalist	Amblyseius swirskii	0.928	0.485	0.684
Adar et al. (2012)	Generalist	Kampimodromus aberrans	1.139	0.387	0.593
Adar et al. (2012)	Generalist	Neoseiulus cucumeris	0.899	0.442	0.646
Adar et al. (2012)	Generalist	Phytoseius plumifer	1.077	0.376	0.582
Adar et al. (2012)	Generalist	Typhlodromus exhilaratus	1.052	0.375	0.581
Adar et al. (2012)	Generalist	Typhlodromus pyri	1.029	0.408	0.614
Liu et al. (2017)	Generalist	<various>	0.925	0.460	0.662	556.9	4.02
Adar et al. (2012)	Pollen	Euseius ovalis	1.164	0.362	0.568
Adar et al. (2012)	Pollen	Euseius scutalis	1.17	0.349	0.555
Liu et al. (2017)	Pollen	Euseius utilis	1.108	0.443	0.646	454.3	3.17
Adar et al. (2012)	Pollen	Iphiseius degenerans	1.069	0.418	0.623
Adar et al. (2012)	Specialist	Neoseiulus californicus	0.885	0.550	0.735
Adar et al. (2012)	Specialist	Phytoseiulus longipes	0.963	0.397	0.604
Adar et al. (2012)	Specialist	Phytoseiulus persimilis	0.932	0.436	0.640
Liu et al. (2017)	Specialist	<various>	0.915	0.454	0.657	347.4	4.06
Buryn and Brandl (1992)	?	Amblyseius okanagensis	–	0.385	0.597	470.6	4.26
Buryn and Brandl (1992)	?	Typhlodromus setualbi	–	0.450	0.645	407.7	4.17

See Liu et al. (2017) for species included in groupings labeled as <various>. Aspect ratio = CL/Average(HBS,HDS)