Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 15;11(4):1733–1753.

Table 3.

Mendelian randomization analysis: the effect of genetically predicted CRP (as log-transformed or categorized) on colorectal cancer risk by number of cigarettes per day

Analytic method All SNPs After exclusion of pleiotropic SNPs


Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 2
Adjustment for age and 10 PCs Adjustment for covariates* Adjustment for age and 10 PCs Adjustment for covariates*
in addition to age and 10 PCs in addition to age and 10 PCs




HR (95% CI) p p-het HR (95% CI) p p-het HR (95% CI) p p-het HR (95% CI) p p-het
GWASs analyzing CRP as a continuous variable that was naturally log-transformed (mg/L)
    <Never smokers>
        Inverse-variance weighted 1.48 (1.01-2.18) 0.045 0.795 1.51 (0.97-2.37) 0.069 0.309 1.53 (1.02-2.30) 0.041 0.742 1.57 (0.97-2.54) 0.063 0.235
        Weighted median 1.82 (1.02-3.26) 0.044 1.59 (0.85-2.96) 0.146 1.82 (0.97-3.44) 0.064 1.75 (0.91-3.34) 0.092
        Penalized weighted median 1.82 (1.02-3.25) 0.044 1.65 (0.87-3.12) 0.125 1.82 (1.004-3.31) 0.049 1.79 (0.94-3.42) 0.079
        MR-Egger: slope 1.58 (0.88-2.84) 0.122 1.44 (0.73-2.86) 0.286 1.59 (0.85-2.95) 0.140 1.46 (0.71-3.01) 0.300
        intercept 1.00 (0.96-1.03) 0.766 1.004 (0.97-1.04) 0.853 1.00 (0.96-1.03) 0.876 1.01 (0.97-1.05) 0.780
GWAS examining CRP as a binary outcome reflecting high immune response and chronic inflammation (CRP > 3.0 mg/L)
    <≥ 15 cigarettes/d>
        Inverse-variance weighted 1.58 (1.03-2.41) 0.041 0.908 1.63 (0.91-2.93) 0.083 0.788
        Weighted median 1.52 (0.74-3.12) 0.256 1.62 (0.76-3.46) 0.210
        Penalized weighted median 1.52 (0.72-3.19) 0.269 1.62 (0.77-3.41) 0.201
        MR-Egger: slope 0.36 (0.04-3.26) 0.236 0.29 (0.01-10.57) 0.351
        intercept 1.37 (0.86-2.18) 0.119 1.44 (0.68-3.06) 0.219
    <MR G×E interaction: scaled GWA CRP weighted-genetic score × number of cigarettes/d>
        G×E univariate slope§ 2.59 1.13-5.91 0.032

CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; GWAS, genome-wide association study; HR, hazard ratio; MR, Mendelian randomization; PCs, principal components; SFA, saturated fatty acid; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism. Numbers in bold face are statistically significant.

*

Covariates that were adjusted for in analyses of the association between GWA CRP-SNPs and colorectal cancer risk include education; annual family income; family history of colorectal cancer; cardiovascular disease ever; high cholesterol requiring medication ever; body mass index; waist-to-hip ratio; physical activity; % calories from SFA/day; dietary alcohol in g/day; number of cigarettes/day; age at menopause; duration of oral contraceptive use; and durations of exogenous estrogen (E)-only and E plus progestin use. Variable tested for stratification was not included as a covariate in the stage 2 analysis.

p value for heterogeneity test in estimates among GWA CRP-SNPs was evaluated with Cochran’s Q test with fixed effects.

The MR estimate was adjusted for a correlation between CRP phenotype and colorectal cancer within the same population.

§

The MR G×E slope reflects an MR estimate from univariate analysis that was corrected for G×E interaction with a modeled (cigarette) variable.

The scaled weighted-genetic score was estimated with 5 CRP SNPs whose effect size reflects chronic inflammation (CRP > 3.0 mg/L) per allele.