Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 12;90(1):109–117. doi: 10.2319/031419-198.1

Table 4.

Results of Multivariable Cox Regression Models for Time to First Fixation on the Mouth in the En Face Images Comparing Appliances Pairwisea

Group
Hazard Ratio
Conficence Interval
P Value
a (aligner) vs b (aligner + attachments) 0.80 0.61–1.05 .110
d (ceramic) vs b (aligner + attachments) 0.96 0.83–1.09 .510
e (control) vs b (aligner + attachments) 0.82 0.74–0.89 <.001
c (lingual app.) vs b (aligner + attachments) 0.82 0.77–0.88 <.001
d (ceramic) vs a (aligner) 1.11 0.84–1.45 .470
e (control) vs a (aligner) 0.80 0.70–0.91 <.001
c (lingual app.) vs a (aligner) 0.77 0.70–0.85 <.001
e (control) vs d (ceramic) 0.61 0.47–0.80 <.001
c (lingual app.) vs d (ceramic) 0.70 0.61–0.80 <.001
c (lingual app.) vs e (control) 0.73 0.55–0.96 .023
a 

app. indicates appliance.