Table 2.

The summary of statistics of the proposed sets.

	$T_1$	$C_1$	$C_2$	$T_2$	$Cu{t}_{75}$	T	$S_1$	$Cu{t}_1$	$Cu{t}_2$	$S_2$	$Leve{l}_1$
No. proteins	20	57	34	71	75	332	1115	2017	2100	3002	7845
Mean of degrees	122.45	95.41	96.44	88.28	406.48	59.65	78.09	69.91	59.12	59.32	59.71
IBP GO terms	439	857	557	975	1384	1870	10,378	14,642	13,726	17,990	18,052
Unique IBP GO terms	400	737	493	821	643	1374	1120	1279	1197	1306	1364
Percentage of Unique IBP GO terms	0.91	0.85	0.88	0.84	0.46	0.73	0.11	0.08	0.08	0.07	0.07
Average Unique IBP GO terms	20	12.92	14.5	11.56	8.57	4.13	1.00	0.63	0.57	0.43	0.17

The first row shows the size of $T_1$, $C_1$, $C_2$, $T_2$, $Cu{t}_{75}$, T, $S_1$, $Cu{t}_1$, $Cu{t}_2$, $S_2$, $Leve{l}_1$ sets. The second row shows the mean of degrees of mentioned sets. The number of 1374 IBP GO terms overlapped with the subsets and their number of unique IBP GO terms are collected in the third and fourth rows, respectively. The ratio of the unique IBP GO terms to total IBP GO terms and the ratio of the number of unique IBP GO terms to the size of the selected set are represented in the fifth and sixth rows, respectively. The complete description of sets is presented in Table 1. Best results are indicated in bold.