Skip to main content
. 2021 May 1;8:113. doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00548-5

Table 1.

QTLs identified in the RIL and IL populations for cuticle mass

QTL Effect LOD PVE P Peak marker Population
cm1.1 lyc solcap59975 IL
cm1.2 lyc solcap48181 IL
cm2.1 lyc 2.8 6.9 0.989 solcap23851 RIL/IL
cm2.2 lyc 3.67 9.8 0.997 solcap42471 RIL/IL
cm3.1 lyc 4.65 11.9 1.000 solcap41353 RIL/IL
cm3.2 lyc 6.85 17.0 1.000 solcap62180 RIL/IL
cm4.1 lyc 3.61 7.8 0.998 solcap3108 RIL/IL
cm5.1 lyc 3.04 6.8 0.992 solcap23797 RIL/IL
cm5.2 pim 3.66 8.9 0.998 solcap37808 RIL/IL
cm7.1 lyc IL
cm10.1 lyc 3.94 8.1 0.999 solcap46305 RIL/IL
cm10.2 pim 3.08 7.3 0.995 solcap14879 RIL/IL
cm11.1 lyc IL
cm11.2 lyc 6.02 13.8 1.000 solcap100974 RIL/IL
cm12.1 lyc 3.84 9.4 0.998 solcap1497 RIL/IL

QTLs are named with a trait abbreviation followed by chromosome number and the number of the QTL within the chromosome. Effect refers to the allele (lyc/pim) that increases the trait. lyc, S. lycopersicum MM. pim, S. pimpinellifolium TO-937

PVE percentage of variance explained by the QTL in the RIL population, P probability. Marker closest to the maximum LOD (logarithm of the odds) score is also shown. cm cuticle mass, RIL recombinant inbred line, IL inbred line