Table 4.

Fold recognition performances with predicted contacts on FM targets (top-20 hits)

Method	CASP12			CASP13
	T	H	X	T	H	X
AlEigen	0.14	0.12	0.08	0.17	0.29	0.25
AlEigen + rc	0.29	0.38	0.42	0.50	0.43	0.62
EigenTHREADER	0.00	0.00	0.17	0.17	0.14	0.12
Eigen THREADER + rc	0.29	0.38	0.42	0.50	0.43	0.62
Map_Align	0.14	0.12	0.08	0.17	0.29	0.25
Map_Align + rc	0.43	0.50	0.42	0.50	0.57	0.50

Note: Comparison of TPR performance achieved on FM targets by AlEigen, EigenTHREADER and Map_Align with their own scoring system against those obtained by using statistically significant congruence coefficient, AlEigen + r_c, EigenTHREADER + r_c and Map_Align + r_c, respectively. ECOD hierarchy: (T) Topology Level (7 targets in CASP12, 6 targets in CASP13), (H) Homology Level (8 targets in CASP12, 7 target in CASP13), (X) Possible Homology Level (12 targets in CASP12, 8 targets in CASP13). Best TPR performances per column are highlighted in bold.