Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 2;13(4):e14260. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14260

Table 2. Mean level of agreement with post-video survey statements among 2D and 360° video users.

Participants were asked to give a score from 0-100 based on how much they agreed with each of 14 statements (summarized in parentheses) with the score of 0 being in complete disagreement and the score of 100 being in complete agreement. Numbers displayed are the means for each question for each group. Comparisons were made with the Wilcoxon test. For the full list of questions, see the Appendix.

  2D 360° p-value   2D 360° p-value
Q1 (“compelling”) 71 86 0.002 Q8 (“enjoyed”) 55 94 <0.001
Q2 (“felt involved”) 29 80 <0.001 Q9 (“mind wandered”) 63 46 0.160
Q3 (“stimulated”) 40 84 <0.001 Q10 (“can use the tech”) 100 85 <0.001
Q4 (“honed in”) 27 76 <0.001 Q11 (“practical”) 53 77 0.007
Q5 (“lost sense of time”) 31 74 <0.001 Q12 (“exciting - tech”) 38 91 <0.001
Q6 (“exciting - videos”) 27 90 <0.001 Q13 (“easy to learn”) 73 86 0.450
Q7 (“easy to use”) 99 95 0.024 Q14 (“more interesting”) 57 94 <0.001