Table 2. Mean level of agreement with post-video survey statements among 2D and 360° video users.
Participants were asked to give a score from 0-100 based on how much they agreed with each of 14 statements (summarized in parentheses) with the score of 0 being in complete disagreement and the score of 100 being in complete agreement. Numbers displayed are the means for each question for each group. Comparisons were made with the Wilcoxon test. For the full list of questions, see the Appendix.
2D | 360° | p-value | 2D | 360° | p-value | ||
Q1 (“compelling”) | 71 | 86 | 0.002 | Q8 (“enjoyed”) | 55 | 94 | <0.001 |
Q2 (“felt involved”) | 29 | 80 | <0.001 | Q9 (“mind wandered”) | 63 | 46 | 0.160 |
Q3 (“stimulated”) | 40 | 84 | <0.001 | Q10 (“can use the tech”) | 100 | 85 | <0.001 |
Q4 (“honed in”) | 27 | 76 | <0.001 | Q11 (“practical”) | 53 | 77 | 0.007 |
Q5 (“lost sense of time”) | 31 | 74 | <0.001 | Q12 (“exciting - tech”) | 38 | 91 | <0.001 |
Q6 (“exciting - videos”) | 27 | 90 | <0.001 | Q13 (“easy to learn”) | 73 | 86 | 0.450 |
Q7 (“easy to use”) | 99 | 95 | 0.024 | Q14 (“more interesting”) | 57 | 94 | <0.001 |