Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 29;12(5):828–836. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13394

Table 1.

Characteristics of the overall cohort and according to the presence and severity of painful diabetic neuropathy

Characteristics All participants (n = 364) Pain‐free (n = 175) Mild pain (n = 125) Moderate/severe pain (n = 64) P‐value
Age (years) 53 (46–60) 51 (45–57) 54 (48–61) 58 (47–61) <0.001
Female, n (%) 119 (32.7) 46 (26.4) 47 (37.3) 26 (40.6) 0.040
DM duration (years) 8 (3–14) 6 (2–10) 10 (4–15) 10 (2–18) 0.001
BMI (kg/m2) 24.8 (23.1–26.9) 24.5 (22.3–26.4) 25.3 (23.2–27.1) 25.0 (23.6–27.6) 0.091
Type 2 diabetes, n (%) 341 (93.7) 168 (96.0) 116 (92.8) 57 (89.1) 0.131
Hypertension, n (%) 165 (45.3) 72 (41.1) 58 (46.4) 35 (54.7) 0.169
Systolic BP (mmHg) 130 (120–141) 130 (120–140) 132 (121–141) 130 (120–143) 0.592
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 80 (76–89) 81 (76–90) 80 (76–87) 80 (75–88) 0.458
FPG (mmol/L) 7.54 (6.54–8.59) 7.21 (6.07–8.15) 7.85 (6.84–9.06) 8.88 (7.40–9.60) <0.001
HbA1c (%) 7.35 (6.73–8.02) 7.12 (6.54–7.59) 7.55 (6.91–8.30) 8.16 (7.27–8.65) <0.001
Fasting C‐peptide (ng/mL) 1.62 ± 0.78 1.72 ± 1.05 1.67 ± 0.92 1.41 ± 0.71 0.057
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 146 (40.1) 70 (40.0) 46 (36.8) 30 (46.9) 0.409
TC (mmol/L) 4.36 (3.61–5.15) 4.20(3.41–5.10) 4.65 (3.76–5.38) 4.39 (3.71–5.22) 0.009
TG (mmol/L) 1.69 (1.16–2.63) 1.58 (1.16–2.52) 1.86 (1.23–2.87) 1.71 (1.12–2.68) 0.193
HDL‐C (mmol/L) 1.03 (0.88–1.20) 1.01 (0.87–1.19) 1.04 (0.89–1.18) 1.12 (0.88–1.31) 0.238
LDL‐C (mmol/L) 2.36 ± 0.41 2.30 ± 0.79 2.46 ± 0.07 2.35 ± 0.96 0.138
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 86.04 ± 18.78 90.45 ± 22.76 87.66 ± 21.64 84.89 ± 23.43 0.034
TIR (%) 78 (65–85) 80 (74–87) 76 (60–85) 65 (49–73) <0.001
SD (mmol/L) 2.21 (1.81–2.75) 2.12 (1.78–2.61) 2.30 (1.81–2.76) 2.79 (2.08–3.21) 0.001
CV (%) 0.30 (0.26–0.34) 0.30 (0.26–0.34) 0.29 (0.25–0.34) 0.32 (0.27–0.37) 0.066
MAGE (mmol/L) 5.13 (4.29–6.14) 4.86 (4.03–5.82) 5.14 (4.28–6.14) 5.73 (4.91–6.95) 0.001
Smoking, n (%) 158 (43.4) 76 (43.4) 49 (39.2) 33 (51.6) 0.268
Drinking, n (%) 182 (50.0) 86 (49.1) 60 (48.0) 36 (56.3) 0.535
Use of antidiabetic agents, n (%) 362 (99.5) 174 (99.4) 124 (99.2) 64 (100) 0.779
OHA 171 (47.3) 94 (54.0) 53 (42.8) 24 (37.5) 0.036
Insulin 53 (14.6) 24 (13.8) 17 (13.7) 12 (18.7) 0.591
Both 138 (38.1) 56 (32.2) 54 (43.5) 28 (43.8) 0.082
TCSS score 8 (7–10) 7 (6–9) 8 (7–10) 9 (7–11) <0.001
Abnormal NCT, n (%) 322 (88.5) 145 (82.9) 117 (93.6) 60 (93.8) <0.001
Abnormal amplitude 65 (20.2) 38 (26.2) 17 (14.6) 10 (16.7) 0.049
Abnormal NCV 78 (24.2) 43 (29.7) 29 (24.7) 6 (10.0) 0.011
Both 179 (55.6) 64 (44.1) 71 (60.7) 44 (73.3) <0.001

Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, median with interquartile range or frequency and proportion. One‐way anova was used to evaluate the samples with a normal distribution between groups. The Kruskal–Wallis H‐test was used to compare the variables with non‐normal distributions. The χ2‐test was used to examine the rates among the groups. BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CV, coefficient of variation; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; MAGE, mean amplitude of glucose excursions; NCT, nerve conduction test; NCV, nerve conduction velocities; OHA, oral hypoglycemic agents; SD, standard deviation; TC, total cholesterol; TCSS, Toronto Clinical Scoring System; TG, triglyceride; TIR, time in range.