Table 4.

Multiple linear regression analysis of the relationship between time in range (%) and numerical rating scale

Independent variable	Mode 1 TIR (%) not adjusted	Model 2 TIR (%)	Model 3 TIR (%) SD	Model 4 TIR (%) CV	Model 5 TIR (%) MAGE
β Coefficient (95% CI)	−0.068 (−0.080 to −0.056)	−0.049 (−0.072 to −0.025)	−0.050 (−0.132 to −0.045)	−0.053 (−0.078 to −0.021)	−0.050 (−0.076 to −0.024)
P‐value	<0.001	<0.001	0.001	<0.001	0.001

Model 1 was not adjusted. Model 2 was adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, diabetes mellitus duration, fasting plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin, fasting C‐peptide, total cholesterol, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, estimated glomerular filtration rate, smoking, drinking, Toronto Clinical Scoring System score, nerve conduction test and antidiabetic agents. Model 3 was adjusted for the variables adjusted for in model 1 + standard deviation (SD). Model 4 was adjusted for the variables adjusted for in model 1 + coefficient of variation (CV). Model 5 was adjusted for the variables adjusted for in model 1 + mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE). CI, confidence interval; NRS, numerical rating scale; TIR, time in range.