Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 29;12(5):828–836. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13394

Table 5.

Associations between quartiles of time in range and various stages of painful diabetic neuropathy after controlling for confounding factors

Models Independent variable Mild pain Moderate/severe pain Any pain
OR P‐value OR P‐value OR P‐value
Model 1 TIR (%)
Q1 (≤65) 2.11 (0.86–5.19) 0.103 5.80 (1.82–18.53) 0.003 2.66 (1.16–6.10) 0.021
Q2 (65–78) 0.62 (0.30–1.31) 0.212 1.60 (0.57–4.48) 0.369 0.82 (0.42–1.61) 0.566
Q3 (78–85) 0.77 (0.37–1.60) 0.482 0.60 (0.18–1.97) 0.402 0.65 (0.33–1.29) 0.219
Q4 (>85) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Model 2 TIR (%)
Q1 (≤65) 2.47 (0.83–7.37) 0.104 5.04 (1.30–19.51) 0.019 2.76 (1.00–7.60) 0.049
Q2 (65–78) 0.68 (0.30–1.51) 0.341 1.49 (0.50–4.41) 0.473 0.84 (0.40–1.74) 0.634
Q3 (78–85) 0.81 (0.38–1.73) 0.581 0.59 (0.17–1.93) 0.373 0.66 (0.32–1.34) 0.246
Q4 (>85) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
SD 0.88 (0.52–1.46) 0.2609 1.14 (0.62–2.09) 0.672 0.97 (0.60–1.57) 0.903
Model 3 TIR (%)
Q1 (≤65) 2.98 (1.02–8.69) 0.045 6.09 (1.57–23.72) 0.009 3.51 (1.29–9.52) 0.014
Q2 (65–78) 0.80 (0.34–1.85) 0.083 1.65 (0.52–5.17) 0.394 1.00 (0.46–2.15) 0.990
Q3 (78–85) 0.91 (0.42–2.00) 0.400 0.62 (0.18–2.11) 0.441 0.74 (1.18–4.08) 0.420
Q4 (>85) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
CV 0.04 (0.00–6.74) 0.233 0.66 (0.02–26.17) 0.891 0.094 (0.01–9.66) 0.317
Model 4 TIR (%)
Q1 (≤65) 2.72 (0.89–8.30) 0.079 5.19 (1.32–20.49) 0.019 2.88 (1.02–8.15) 0.046
Q2 (65–78) 0.73 (0.32–1.67) 0.454 1.48 (0.48–4.51) 0.494 0.86 (0.40–1.83) 0.020
Q3 (78–85) 0.85 (0.39–1.86) 0.685 0.57 (0.17–1.94) 0.368 0.67 (0.32–1.38) 0.019
Q4 (>85) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
MAGE 0.91 (0.72–1.51) 0.431 1.05 (0.81–1.37) 0.713 0.97 (0.78–1.21) 0.804

Model 1 was adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, diabetes mellitus duration, fasting plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin, fasting C‐peptide, total cholesterol, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, estimated glomerular filtration rate, smoking, drinking, Toronto Clinical Scoring System score, nerve conduction test and antidiabetic agents. Model 2 was adjusted for the variables adjusted for in model1 + standard deviation. Model 3 was adjusted for the variables adjusted for in model 1 + coefficient of variation. Model 4 was adjusted for the variables adjusted for in model 1 + mean amplitude of glucose excursions. OR, odds ratio; TIR, time in range.