Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2021 Mar 2;89(6):731–741. doi: 10.1002/prot.26055

Table 1:

Simulation Systems

Name Starting structure Type Duration [ns]
A1_sim_1,2 PDB code 1AUQ 300 Ka 2 × 50
A2_sim_1,2,3 PDB code 3GXB 300 Ka 3 × 40b
A1A2_1_sim1,2 complex model 300 Ka 2 × 50
A1A2_2_sim1,2 complex model 300 Ka 2 × 50
A1A2_3_sim1,2 complex model 300 Ka 2 × 50
A1A2_4_sim1,2 complex model 300 Ka 2 × 50
A1A2_6_sim1,2 complex model 300 Ka 2 × 50
A1A2_6_sim1,2 complex model 300 Ka 2 × 50
A1_M1393_fep_1,2,3 A1_WT_1 (10+20 ns), A1_WT_2 (10 ns) FEP 3 × 10
A2_M1495_fep_1,2,3 A2_WT_1 (10+20 ns), A2_WT_2 (10 ns) FEP 3 × 10c
A2_M1545_fep_1,2,3 A2_WT_1 (10+20 ns), A2_WT_2 (10 ns) FEP 3 × 10
A1A2_l_M1495_fep_1,2,3 A1A2_2met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_2met_2 (10 ns) FEP 3 × 10
A1A2_2_M1393_fep_1,2,3 A1A2_2met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_2met_2 (10 ns) FEP 3 × 10
A1A2_2_M1495_fep_1,2,3 A1A2_2met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_2met_2 (10 ns) FEP 3 × 10
A1A2_3_M1545_fep_1,2,3 A1A2_1met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_lmet_2 (10 ns) FEP 3 × 10
A1A2_4_M1393_fep_1,2,3 A1A2_2met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_2met_2 (10 ns) FEP 3 × 10
A1A2_4_M1495_fep_1,2,3 A1A2_2met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_2met_2 (10 ns) FEP 3 × 10
A1lA2_5_M1545_fep_1,2,3 A1A2_1met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_lmet_2 (10 ns) FEP 3 × 10
A1A2_6_M1545_fep_1,2,3 A1A2_1met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_lmet_2 (10 ns) FEP 3 × 10
a

These simulations sampled the unoxidized conformational state of either the isolated domains or the A1A2 complex at room temperature and did not involve FEP.

b

These simulations were performed as part of a previous study.28

c

These simulations were performed as part of a previous study.21 All simulations were performed in either duplicates or triplicates and labeled with indexes (e.g., 1, 2, 3 for triplicates), respectively. The FEP simulations were started from snapshots sampled along the “300 K” runs as indicated.