Table 1:
Name | Starting structure | Type | Duration [ns] |
---|---|---|---|
A1_sim_1,2 | PDB code 1AUQ | 300 Ka | 2 × 50 |
A2_sim_1,2,3 | PDB code 3GXB | 300 Ka | 3 × 40b |
A1A2_1_sim1,2 | complex model | 300 Ka | 2 × 50 |
A1A2_2_sim1,2 | complex model | 300 Ka | 2 × 50 |
A1A2_3_sim1,2 | complex model | 300 Ka | 2 × 50 |
A1A2_4_sim1,2 | complex model | 300 Ka | 2 × 50 |
A1A2_6_sim1,2 | complex model | 300 Ka | 2 × 50 |
A1A2_6_sim1,2 | complex model | 300 Ka | 2 × 50 |
A1_M1393_fep_1,2,3 | A1_WT_1 (10+20 ns), A1_WT_2 (10 ns) | FEP | 3 × 10 |
A2_M1495_fep_1,2,3 | A2_WT_1 (10+20 ns), A2_WT_2 (10 ns) | FEP | 3 × 10c |
A2_M1545_fep_1,2,3 | A2_WT_1 (10+20 ns), A2_WT_2 (10 ns) | FEP | 3 × 10 |
A1A2_l_M1495_fep_1,2,3 | A1A2_2met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_2met_2 (10 ns) | FEP | 3 × 10 |
A1A2_2_M1393_fep_1,2,3 | A1A2_2met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_2met_2 (10 ns) | FEP | 3 × 10 |
A1A2_2_M1495_fep_1,2,3 | A1A2_2met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_2met_2 (10 ns) | FEP | 3 × 10 |
A1A2_3_M1545_fep_1,2,3 | A1A2_1met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_lmet_2 (10 ns) | FEP | 3 × 10 |
A1A2_4_M1393_fep_1,2,3 | A1A2_2met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_2met_2 (10 ns) | FEP | 3 × 10 |
A1A2_4_M1495_fep_1,2,3 | A1A2_2met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_2met_2 (10 ns) | FEP | 3 × 10 |
A1lA2_5_M1545_fep_1,2,3 | A1A2_1met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_lmet_2 (10 ns) | FEP | 3 × 10 |
A1A2_6_M1545_fep_1,2,3 | A1A2_1met_1 (10+20 ns), A1A2_lmet_2 (10 ns) | FEP | 3 × 10 |
These simulations sampled the unoxidized conformational state of either the isolated domains or the A1A2 complex at room temperature and did not involve FEP.
These simulations were performed as part of a previous study.28
These simulations were performed as part of a previous study.21 All simulations were performed in either duplicates or triplicates and labeled with indexes (e.g., 1, 2, 3 for triplicates), respectively. The FEP simulations were started from snapshots sampled along the “300 K” runs as indicated.