Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 27;47(4):249–257. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3938

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis of relative risk of high job strain with T2DM risk. [T2DM=type 2 diabetes mellitus; BMI=body mass index; RR=relative risk; CI=confidence interval.]

Reports (N) RR 95% CI I2 (%) P a

Gender b
 Men 5 1.02 0.76–1.36 43.5 0.132
 Women 4 1.48 1.02–2.14 61.3 0.057
Study location
 Europe 5 1.16 1.01–1.33 46.9 0.110
 Asia 1 1.34 0.50–3.57
T2DM ascertainment
 Objectively defined 6 1.16 1.03–1.31 34.4 0.179
 Self-reported 0
Controlling smoking in models
 Yes 1 1.14 0.94–2.20
 No 5 1.14 1.00–1.30 39.3 0.159
Controlling drinking in models
 Yes 1 1.14 0.94–2.20
 No 5 1.14 1.00–1.30 39.3 0.159
Controlling physical activity in models
 Yes 1 1.14 0.94–2.20
 No 5 1.14 1.00–1.30 39.3 0.159
Controlling BMI in models
 Yes 1 1.14 0.94–2.20
 No 5 1.14 1.00–1.30 39.3 0.159
Controlling family history of DM in models
 Yes 1 1.14 0.94–2.20
 No 5 1.14 1.00–1.30 39.3 0.159
Controlling education in models
 Yes 1 1.14 0.94–2.20
 No 5 1.14 1.00–1.30 39.3 0.159
a

P-value for homogeneity.

b

Pan et al (2017) stratified by gender and age (60 years old population and population aged ≥ 66 years old) were treated as for four separate reports.