Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 19;12:650967. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.650967

Table 3.

Literature summary of BIPSS outcome in Cushing’s disease in children.

Study Study cohort Mean age; age range (years) Study duration Baseline C/P ratio > 2 Post-CRH/desmopressin stimulation C/P ratio >3 Compatibility of localization of a microadenoma by BIPSS with surgical location
Lienhardt et al. (8) 11 12.3 ± 3.9;
10.6-18.8
1986-2000 N.A. 91% (ratio >2) 91% d
Joshi et al. (18) 25
(19 BIPSS)
13.4
6.6-17.8
1984-2003 N.A. 100% 73.7%, 94% d
Batista et al. (19) 94 13 ± 3.2;
5.3 - 18.7
1982-2004 90% 97% 60.3% (baseline), 58%(CRH stimulation)
Shah et al. (20) 48
(14 BIPSS)
14.9 ± 2.5; 9-19 1988-2008 89% a N.A. N.A.
Storr et al. (21) 41
(33 BIPSS)
12.3 ± 3.5; 5.7-17.8 1960-2001 75.9% 86.2% 75.8%, 81.8% d
Lonser et al. (22) 140 N.A.;
5.8-20.8
1982-2010 N.A. 99.3 b 81.8%
Yordanova et al. (23) 21
(19 BIPSS)
12.1;
5.7-17.8
1986-2010 N.A. N.A. b 74%
Güemes et al. (24) 30 8.9;
0.2–15.5
1983-2013 100% 100% N.A.
Chen et al. (25) 16
(17 BIPSS)
15.5 ± 2.9;
9.8-18.7
2006-2017 64.7% 83.3% c 50% (baseline), 42.9% c
Cavalcante et al. (26) 19 14;
9-19
1993-2017 84.2% 94.4% c 60% c
Authors’ series 31
(12 BIPSS)
11.6;
7.2-17
2003-2020 75% 83.3% 58.3%, 66.7% d
a

baseline ratio criteria ≥ 2.

b

peak ratio criteria ≥3.

c

desmopressin stimulation.

d

total prediction rate (lateralization and no lateralization in case of central adenoma localization).