Greig 2017.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Parallel RCT, individuals randomised | |
Data | UK, secondary care. All host trial participants were included in this trial. Total n = 60; mean age 5.8 (SD 3.5); 48.3% females. |
|
Comparisons |
Intervention group 1 had a postal follow‐up. Intervention group 2 had a clinic follow‐up. |
|
Outcomes | Participants with a valid response. | |
Notes | Retention period: 4 months. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment? | Unclear | Not reported in the paper. |
Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | Not reported in the paper. |
Blinding of participants and personnel? | Yes | Not clear if participants were blinded to effect of embedded trial intervention on retention but unblinding not a likely impact objective outcome. |
Blinding of outcome assessment? | Yes | Not reported in the paper.However, objective outcome, staff have no plausible additional opportunity to influence postal response rate once questionnaires sent. |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | Yes | No concerns raised. |
Free of selective outcome reporting? | Yes | No concerns raised. |
Other sources of bias | Yes | No further concerns raised. |
Overall Risk of Bias | Unclear | Unclear |