Keding 2016.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Factorial RCT, individuals randomised. | |
Data | UK, primary care setting. All host trial participants who consented to SMS notifications. Total n = 523; mean age 41.0 (SD 11.5) years; 76% females; 41% were full time workers. |
|
Comparisons | Three sequential trials: Trial 1 (3‐month follow‐up): Intervention group received pre‐notification text. Control group received no text. Trial 2 (6‐month follow‐up): Intervention group received a pre‐notification text Control group received a post notification text Trial 3 (9‐month follow‐up): Intervention group received a post notification reminder text Control group did not receive a text |
|
Outcomes | Proportion of participants who returned a valid questionnaire to the trial team. | |
Notes | Retention period: 3‐, 6‐ and 9‐months | |
Risk of bias | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment? | Unclear | Not reported in the paper. |
Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | Not reported in the paper. |
Blinding of participants and personnel? | Yes | independent randomisation and that participants were blind to the trial hypothesis. |
Blinding of outcome assessment? | Yes | Not reported in the paper. However, objective outcome, staff have no plausible additional opportunity to influence postal response rate once questionnaires sent. |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | Yes | No concerns raised. |
Free of selective outcome reporting? | Yes | No concerns raised. |
Other sources of bias | Yes | No further concerns raised. |
Overall Risk of Bias | Unclear | Unclear |