Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 6;2021(3):MR000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub3

Keding 2016.

Study characteristics
Methods Factorial RCT, individuals randomised.
Data UK, primary care setting.
All host trial participants who consented to SMS notifications.
Total n = 523; mean age 41.0 (SD 11.5) years; 76% females; 41% were full time workers.
Comparisons Three sequential trials:
Trial 1 (3‐month follow‐up):
Intervention group received pre‐notification text.
Control group received no text.
Trial 2 (6‐month follow‐up):
Intervention group received a pre‐notification text
Control group received a post notification text
Trial 3 (9‐month follow‐up):
Intervention group received a post notification reminder text
Control group did not receive a text
Outcomes Proportion of participants who returned a valid questionnaire to the trial team.
Notes Retention period: 3‐, 6‐ and 9‐months
Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear Not reported in the paper.
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear Not reported in the paper.
Blinding of participants and personnel? Yes independent randomisation and that participants were blind to the trial hypothesis.
Blinding of outcome assessment? Yes Not reported in the paper.
However, objective outcome, staff have no plausible additional opportunity to influence postal response rate once questionnaires sent.
Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes Yes No concerns raised.
Free of selective outcome reporting? Yes No concerns raised.
Other sources of bias Yes No further concerns raised.
Overall Risk of Bias Unclear Unclear