Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 6;2021(3):MR000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub3

Marson 2007.

Study characteristics
Methods Parallel RCT, individuals randomised
Data UK, secondary care setting.
It is unclear if all participants from host trial were involved.
Total n = 1815; age NR; sex NR
Comparisons Intervention group received a cover letter though post with the questionnaire that included an estimate of the length of time that it may take to complete.
Control group received standard cover letter with no indication of length of time required.
Outcomes Return of questionnaire.
Notes Retention period: baseline assessment
Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear Not reported in the monograph.
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear Not reported in the monograph.
Blinding of participants and personnel? Yes Not reported in the monograph but unblinding not likely to impact objective outcome
Blinding of outcome assessment? Yes Not reported in the monograph.
Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes Unclear Not reported in the monograph. However, objective outcome, staff have no plausible additional opportunity to influence postal response rate once questionnaires sent.
Free of selective outcome reporting? Unclear Not reported in the monograph.
Other sources of bias Yes No further concerns raised.
Overall Risk of Bias Unclear Unclear