Marson 2007.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Parallel RCT, individuals randomised | |
Data | UK, secondary care setting. It is unclear if all participants from host trial were involved. Total n = 1815; age NR; sex NR |
|
Comparisons |
Intervention group received a cover letter though post with the questionnaire that included an estimate of the length of time that it may take to complete. Control group received standard cover letter with no indication of length of time required. |
|
Outcomes | Return of questionnaire. | |
Notes | Retention period: baseline assessment | |
Risk of bias | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment? | Unclear | Not reported in the monograph. |
Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear | Not reported in the monograph. |
Blinding of participants and personnel? | Yes | Not reported in the monograph but unblinding not likely to impact objective outcome |
Blinding of outcome assessment? | Yes | Not reported in the monograph. |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | Unclear | Not reported in the monograph. However, objective outcome, staff have no plausible additional opportunity to influence postal response rate once questionnaires sent. |
Free of selective outcome reporting? | Unclear | Not reported in the monograph. |
Other sources of bias | Yes | No further concerns raised. |
Overall Risk of Bias | Unclear | Unclear |