Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 5;2021(3):CD011246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011246.pub2

Novack 2009.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: randomised (2‐arm parallel randomised controlled clinical trial)
Sample size: 371
Method of randomisation: no information specified
Method of concealment: no information specified
Blinding: double‐blind
Analysis: intention‐to‐treat
Date the study was conducted: no information specified
Participants Location: USA
Total N randomised: 99
Intervention n: 49 (79 % male; age M = 35, SD = 17)
Control n: 50 (66 % male; age M = 35, SD = 16)
Inclusion criteria: within 8 weeks of injury ( = traumatic brain injury); injury sufficient to require inpatient rehabilitation; age 19‐75
Diagnostic criteria ‐ long‐term physical condition: traumatic brain injury: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of ≤ 12, or neuroimaging results consistent with the effects of trauma (e.g., contusion, subdural hematoma) at admission
Diagnostic criteria ‐ depression: diagnosis according to DSM‐IV assessed by SCID‐I
Exclusion criteria: existing neurological difficulties; use of antidepressant medication at the time of injury; administration of antidepressant medication in the hospital prior to enrolment; ongoing steroid treatment; depression necessitating treatment at the time of enrolment; pregnancy, alcohol or drug abuse in the year prior to the injury; systemic medical illnesses that would independently limit outcome (such as severe renal disease and cardiac difficulties)
History of depression: no
Interventions Intervention: daily dose of 50 mg sertraline
Control: placebo
Duration of treatment: 3 months
Length of follow‐up: 12 months (3, 6, and 12 months)
Other study arms: no
Outcomes Primary outcome:
  • incidence of depression ‐ diagnosis: diagnosis according to DSM‐IV assessed by SCID‐I

  • adverse events: N/A


Secondary outcome:
  • incidence of depression ‐ cut‐off: HDRS cut‐off score ≥ 8; HDRS cut‐off score ≥ 6 (note: we only reported the primary outcome: incidence of depression assessed by diagnosis)

  • severity of depression: NFI

  • cost‐effectiveness: N/A

  • cost‐utility: N/A

Notes Language: English
Funding: National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research Grant H133A980010 Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Project
Declaration of interest: none reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk no information specified
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk no information specified
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk "If depression was confirmed, the blind was broken for the treating physician, but not for the psychometrician performing the outcome assessments" (p. 1923)
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk "If depression was confirmed, the blind was broken for the treating physician, but not for the psychometrician performing the outcome assessments" (p. 1923)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk numbers randomised: sertraline: n = 49; placebo: n = 50; total: N = 99
number of drop‐outs at 3 months: sertraline: n = 1; placebo: n = 2; total: N = 3
number of drop‐outs at 12 months: sertraline: n = 13; placebo: n = 14; total: N = 27
numbers analysed post‐intervention at 3 months: sertraline: n = 48; placebo: n = 48; total: N = 96
numbers analysed at follow‐up at 12 months: sertraline: n = 36; placebo: n = 36; total: N = 72
reasons for drop‐out (p. 1926):
sertraline: stopped taking study meds, lost or withdrew, O‐Log < 25 or nursing home, adverse events, expired
placebo: stopped taking study meds, lost or withdrew, O‐Log < 25 or nursing home, expired
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk no protocol available
Other bias Low risk no