Novack 2009.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomised (2‐arm parallel randomised controlled clinical trial) Sample size: 371 Method of randomisation: no information specified Method of concealment: no information specified Blinding: double‐blind Analysis: intention‐to‐treat Date the study was conducted: no information specified |
|
Participants |
Location: USA Total N randomised: 99 Intervention n: 49 (79 % male; age M = 35, SD = 17) Control n: 50 (66 % male; age M = 35, SD = 16) Inclusion criteria: within 8 weeks of injury ( = traumatic brain injury); injury sufficient to require inpatient rehabilitation; age 19‐75 Diagnostic criteria ‐ long‐term physical condition: traumatic brain injury: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of ≤ 12, or neuroimaging results consistent with the effects of trauma (e.g., contusion, subdural hematoma) at admission Diagnostic criteria ‐ depression: diagnosis according to DSM‐IV assessed by SCID‐I Exclusion criteria: existing neurological difficulties; use of antidepressant medication at the time of injury; administration of antidepressant medication in the hospital prior to enrolment; ongoing steroid treatment; depression necessitating treatment at the time of enrolment; pregnancy, alcohol or drug abuse in the year prior to the injury; systemic medical illnesses that would independently limit outcome (such as severe renal disease and cardiac difficulties) History of depression: no |
|
Interventions |
Intervention: daily dose of 50 mg sertraline Control: placebo Duration of treatment: 3 months Length of follow‐up: 12 months (3, 6, and 12 months) Other study arms: no |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcome:
Secondary outcome:
|
|
Notes |
Language: English Funding: National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research Grant H133A980010 Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Project Declaration of interest: none reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | no information specified |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | no information specified |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "If depression was confirmed, the blind was broken for the treating physician, but not for the psychometrician performing the outcome assessments" (p. 1923) |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "If depression was confirmed, the blind was broken for the treating physician, but not for the psychometrician performing the outcome assessments" (p. 1923) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk |
numbers randomised: sertraline: n = 49; placebo: n = 50; total: N = 99 number of drop‐outs at 3 months: sertraline: n = 1; placebo: n = 2; total: N = 3 number of drop‐outs at 12 months: sertraline: n = 13; placebo: n = 14; total: N = 27 numbers analysed post‐intervention at 3 months: sertraline: n = 48; placebo: n = 48; total: N = 96 numbers analysed at follow‐up at 12 months: sertraline: n = 36; placebo: n = 36; total: N = 72 reasons for drop‐out (p. 1926): sertraline: stopped taking study meds, lost or withdrew, O‐Log < 25 or nursing home, adverse events, expired placebo: stopped taking study meds, lost or withdrew, O‐Log < 25 or nursing home, expired |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | no protocol available |
Other bias | Low risk | no |