Chow 2019.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | 21 overweight participants: 18F/3M, mean (SE), age: 44.7 years (2.7), BMI:34.6 kg/m2(1.7) Inclusion and exclusion criteria: nothing noted |
|
Interventions |
2 arm trial Intervention (n=11): time restricted feeding Comparator (n=10): ad libitum feeding |
|
Outcomes | Weight, lean mass, triglycerides, visceral fat, glucose | |
Notes |
Type of paper: abstract only Funded by: University of Minnesota Healthy Foods Healthy Lives (17SFR‐2YR50LC) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Abstract only and method of randomisation not stated in abstract. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Abstract only and allocation concealment not indicated. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Since this trial was a dietary intervention study, it was not feasible for participants or all study personnel to be blinded to the group assignment |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Abstract only and blinding of outcome assessment not indicated. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Abstract only and loss to follow‐up not reported in abstract. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Abstract only. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Abstract only. |