Corley 2019.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | Obese and overweight men Inclusion and exclusion criteria: no data provided |
|
Interventions |
2‐arm trial Intervention: intermittent fast consisting of two days of 25% restriction and 5 days of isocaloric intake per week over six weeks Comparator: 79% daily restriction |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes: body composition, resting energy expenditure. Secondary outcomes were change in HbA1c, blood pressure, fasting lipids, leptin,ghrelin, adiponectin and thyroid function tests | |
Notes |
Type of paper: abstract only Funding: no data There were no contact details provided to contact the authors to include any data, therefore this study has not been quantitatively analysed. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Abstract only and method of randomisation not stated in abstract. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Abstract only and allocation concealment not indicated. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Since this trial was a dietary intervention study, it was not feasible for participants or all study personnel to be blinded to the group assignment. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Abstract only and blinding of outcome assessment not indicated. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Abstract only and loss to follow‐up not reported in abstract. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Abstract only. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Abstract only. |