Kroeger 2015.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | 48 obese participants Inclusion and exclusion criteria: none provided |
|
Interventions |
2‐arm trial Intervention: ADF (75% restriction fast day alternated with ad libitum feed day), Comparator: CR (25% restriction everyday), for a 6‐month weight loss period followed by a 6‐month weight maintenance period. |
|
Outcomes | Body weight, fat mass, visceral fat mass, fat free mass, plasma glucose, insulin levels and insulin resistance. | |
Notes |
Type of paper: abstract only Funding: none provided Other: absolute changes were provided in the abstract but the number of people in each of the arms was not stated. No contact details were provided to contact the authors to provide extra data. ADF‐ Alternate day fasting CR‐ calorie restriction |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Abstract only and method of randomisation not stated in abstract. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Since this trial was a dietary intervention study, it was not feasible for participants or all study personnel to be blinded to the group assignment |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Abstract only and blinding of outcome assessment not indicated. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Abstract only and loss to follow‐up not reported in abstract. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Abstract only. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Abstract only. |