Moro 2016.

Study characteristics
Methods	Randomised controlled trial
Participants	34 participants based in the USA who have performed resistance training continuously for the last 5 years. Inclusion and exclusion criteria: the criteria for entering the study were that participants must have performed resistance training continuously for at least 5 years (training 3–5 days/week with at least 3 years experience in split training routines), be presently engaged in regular resistance training at the time of recruitment, be life‐long steroid free, and have no clinical problems that could be aggravated by the study procedures.
Interventions	2‐arm trial Intervention (n = 17): time restricted feeding (16 hours fasting, 8 hours feeding) Comparator (n = 17): ad libitum feeding/normal diet
Outcomes	Lipid profile
Notes	Other: data presented as percentage changes. Authors contacted for absolute changes but no response was given. Therefore, data unfortunately not included in quantitative analysis. Funding: this research was conducted with authors’ institutional founds Type of paper: full‐text publication
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Low risk	Participants were randomly assigned to a time‐restricted feeding group (TRF; n = 17) or standard diet group (ND; n = 17) through computer‐generated software.
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Although it was stated quote: "the research staff conducting outcome assessments was unaware of the assignment of the subjects (i.e. a single blind design)", it was not indicated how the assignment sequence was concealed.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	High risk	Since this trial was a dietary intervention study, it was not feasible for participants or all study personnel to be blinded to the group assignment.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	Quote: "The research staff conducting outcome assessments was unaware of the assignment of the subjects (i.e. a single blind design)."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	There was no information provided regarding dropout or the number of completers.
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Unclear risk	Unclear.
Other bias	Low risk	Nothing to note.