Saengow 2018.

Study characteristics
Methods	Study design: RCT Method of randomisation: day of the week Setting: pediatric neurology clinic in Thailand Follow‐up: 3 months Date it was conducted: June 2016‐September 2016 Source of funding: not reported Conflict of interest: nothing reported
Participants	Inclusion criteria: pediatric patients aged between 1 month‐15 years, diagnosed with epilepsy, visited routine service pediatric neurology clinic. Sample size: 214 patients were recruited (IG: 126, CG: 88) Age: mean 7.6 (mean 4.5) in IG and 7.6 (mean 4.8) in CG Gender: female 53 (42.1%) in IG and 36 (40.9%) in CG
Interventions	Type of intervention: educational An 8.52‐min video animation on: diagnosis of epilepsy, etiology of epilepsy, treatment of epilepsy, first aid seizure care, prognosis of epilepsy and safe activity for epilepsy
Outcomes	Primary outcomes: adherence measured using the 8‐item MMAS Epilepsy knowledge measured using 10 questions on epilepsy knowledge Secondary outcomes: severity of seizure
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	High risk	Days of the week
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	No information on concealment was reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	No information on blinding was reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	No information on blinding was reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Low risk	Apparently, no incomplete outcome data
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Unclear risk	Insufficient information to permit judgement
Other bias	Unclear risk	Insufficient rationale or evidence to permit judgement