Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 15;2021(1):CD013198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013198.pub2

Suzuki 2001.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: randomised, controlled, open‐label, parallel‐group design
Duration: 52 weeks
Location: Japan (no other information)
Participants Population: 109 adults with COPD (severity not reported) were randomly assigned to erythromycin (n = 55) or control (n = 54)
Baseline characteristics: age (mean years): 70.4; % male (mean): 83.4; FEV₁ (mean): 2.64 (SE 0.05); pack‐years: not reported; former or current smokers: not reported; exacerbation history: not reported
Inclusion criteria: mean FEV₁ (L): 1.47 (erythromycin) and 1.30 (placebo); females 13% in erythromycin group vs 18% in placebo group; all study participants were treated with sustained‐release theophylline and inhaled anticholinergic agents
Exclusion criteria: diagnosis of bronchiectasis or diffuse pan bronchiolitis
Interventions
  • Erithromycin (200 to 400 mg daily)

  • No active treatment


Allowed co‐medications: sustained‐release theophylline and inhaled anticholinergic agents. Corticosteroids were not allowed
Outcomes Acute exacerbations of COPD, adverse events
Notes Funding: not reported
Identifier: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation was performed by a random numbers table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk The randomisation list was held independently from the investigators
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk This study was not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk As the study was not blinded, assessment of outcomes would be biased
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk One participant was excluded due to adverse events of erythromycin; all participants were clearly accounted for
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All pre‐specified outcomes were reported
Other bias Low risk No other bias was identified