Suzuki 2001.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Design: randomised, controlled, open‐label, parallel‐group design Duration: 52 weeks Location: Japan (no other information) |
|
Participants |
Population: 109 adults with COPD (severity not reported) were randomly assigned to erythromycin (n = 55) or control (n = 54) Baseline characteristics: age (mean years): 70.4; % male (mean): 83.4; FEV₁ (mean): 2.64 (SE 0.05); pack‐years: not reported; former or current smokers: not reported; exacerbation history: not reported Inclusion criteria: mean FEV₁ (L): 1.47 (erythromycin) and 1.30 (placebo); females 13% in erythromycin group vs 18% in placebo group; all study participants were treated with sustained‐release theophylline and inhaled anticholinergic agents Exclusion criteria: diagnosis of bronchiectasis or diffuse pan bronchiolitis |
|
Interventions |
Allowed co‐medications: sustained‐release theophylline and inhaled anticholinergic agents. Corticosteroids were not allowed |
|
Outcomes | Acute exacerbations of COPD, adverse events | |
Notes |
Funding: not reported Identifier: not reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation was performed by a random numbers table |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | The randomisation list was held independently from the investigators |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | This study was not blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | As the study was not blinded, assessment of outcomes would be biased |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | One participant was excluded due to adverse events of erythromycin; all participants were clearly accounted for |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All pre‐specified outcomes were reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No other bias was identified |