Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 17;65(3):e02168-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02168-20

TABLE 3.

Final model parameter estimates and variability for tenofovir pharmacokineticsa

Parameter Final model
Bootstrap analysis,
final model
Population median %RSE Median 2.5% 97.5%
Structural (base) model
CL/F (liter/h/kg0.75) 2.07 0.09 2.00 1.85 2.16
V1/F (liter/kg) 6.37 1.07 6.34 4.87 8.70
V2/F (liter/kg) 9.55 1.20 9.60 8.12 12.30
Ka (h−1) 6.93 NA NA NA NA
Q (liter/h/kg0.75) 3.14 0.95 3.15 0.05 4.69
SCr factor −0.65 0.13 −0.66 −0.90 −0.36
Statistical model
BSV (%)
Vss/F 25 21 24 5 40
CL/F 24 12 23 17 29
IOV-CL/F 26 15
Residual variability
Proportional (% CV) 3.0 2.6 3.0 1.1 6.0
Power exponent 1.43 0.08 1.38 1.25 1.54
a

Vss/F, volume of distribution at steady state; IOV, interoccasion (within-subject) variability; CL/F, apparent clearance; Ka, absorption rate constant; V1/F, apparent volume of distribution of the central compartment; V2/F, apparent volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment; Q, intercompartmental clearance; SCr, serum creatinine; NA, not applicable; %RSE, relative standard error of parameter estimate. Between-subject variability and residual (proportion) variability estimates are shown as percent coefficient of variation (% CV).