Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 17;65(3):e02091-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02091-20

TABLE 3.

Twenty-year perspective on INHr mutants based on survey results

Location of resistance mutation(s) Results for survey period:
September 2013 to December 2019 (current study)
January 2000 to August 2013 (Seifert et al.)
January 2000 to December 2019 (both studies)
No. of INHr mutants Total no. of INHr % No. of INHr mutants Total no. of INHr % No. of INHr mutants Total no. of INHr %
katG315 4,271 5,804 73.6 5,400 8,416 64.2 9,671 14,220 68.0
inhA-15 787 5,804 13.6 1,189a 6,192 19.2 1,976a 11,996 16.5
inhA-8 106 5,804 1.8 77a 5,955 1.3e 183a 11,759 1.6
katG 4,391 5,804 75.7 4,068b 6,136f 66.3b 8,459b 11,940f 70.8b
inhA 978 5,804 16.9 926c 4,495f 20.6c 1,904c 10,299f 18.5c
oxyR′-ahpC 107 5,804 1.8 91d 1,685f 5.4d 198d 7,489f 2.6d
katG and inhA 4,894 5,804 84.3 1,271b,c 1,582f 80.3b,c 6,165b,c 7,386f 83.5b,c
katG and inhA and oxyR′-ahpC 4,967 5,804 85.6 1,328b,c,d 1,583f 83.9b,c,d 6,295b,c,d 7,387f 85.2b,c,d
Unexplained INHr 837 5,804 14.4 1,406f 8,786 16 2,243f 14,590 15.4
a

Calculated from the counts of total INHr isolates and frequency of mutation reported by Seifert et al. (9).

b

Only codons 309, 311, 315, and 316 were considered by Seifert et al. (9), although they report other mutations in the gene in their supplemental tables. This is thus a lower bound for the sensitivity of katG for their reported period.

c

Only positions −15, −8, −47, and −17 were considered by Seifert et al. (9), although they report other mutations in their supplemental tables. This is thus a lower bound for sensitivity of inhA for their reported period.

d

Only positions −10, −6, −39, −48, −15, −12, and −9 were considered by Seifert et al. (9), although they report other mutations in the region in their supplemental tables. This is thus a lower bound for the sensitivity of the oxyR′-ahpC intergenic region for their reported period.

e

This table reflects the value as reported by Seifert et al. However, I believe that this value was incorrectly calculated, and the correct frequency should be 2.25%. Please see Discussion.

f

Total count is calculated from mutant INHr count and the frequency of the mutation reported by Seifert et al. (9).