Jain 1988.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Multi‐arm RCT – 3 groups | |
Participants | Women with moderate to severe pain following episiotomy Clinical research centre, New Orleans, USA Women with known hypersensitivity to NSAID agents, history of allergy to aspirin, ibuprofen or caffeine, history of asthma, clinically significant renal, hepatic, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurologic, or cerebral dysfunction or with a history of peptic ulcer disease or gastrointestinal blood loss, uncontrolled diabetes, drug abuse or alcoholism, were excluded Use of caffeine, anti‐inflammatory agent, tranquilliser or sedative was prohibited during the 4 hours prior to administration of test medication as well as during the study period |
|
Interventions | Intervention: caffeine 100 mg + ibuprofen 200 mg (N = 50) and ibuprofen 400 mg (N = 49) Comparison: placebo (N = 48) |
|
Outcomes |
Pain assessed at baseline and 30 minutes after and thereafter hourly up to 6 hours. Only 6‐hour data used in this review (4‐hour data could not be extracted) |
|
Notes | Caffeine 100 mg + ibuprofen 200 mg combination therapy not include in the review, as not pure NSAID Dates of study: NR Funding sources: NR Declarations of interest: NR |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated randomisation schedule |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Supplied in unit dose bottles containing identical tablets; no information if sequentially‐numbered and sealed |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No clear statement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Of 161 women selected, 14 (9%) were excluded from the analysis; 11 due to rescue medication before the 2‐hour follow‐up (4 in the ibuprofen 400 mg group, 4 in the placebo group (and 3 in the ibuprofen 200 mg + caffeine group which was not included in this review)), 2 due to use of confounding agents and 1 because she was under 18 years old (not specified from which group). Attrition rates could not be calculated due to non‐report of the exact number of participants in each group at the start of the study |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Prespecified outcomes were all reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No statistical differences across groups by demographic variables and baseline pain intensity measures |