Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 8;2020(12):MR000040. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000040.pub3

Comparison 3. Subgroup analyses for clinical guidelines.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3.1 Different types of financial conflicts of interest 2   Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1.1 Advisory board membership 1 5 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.80 [0.24, 33.04]
3.1.2 Consultancy 1 5 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.80 [0.24, 33.04]
3.1.3 Grants 1 4 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.50 [0.20, 31.00]
3.1.4 Honoraria 1 5 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.80 [0.24, 33.04]
3.1.5 Industry funding of the clinical guideline 1 18 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.42 [0.88, 2.30]
3.1.6 Speaker fees 1 5 Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.80 [0.24, 33.04]
3.2 Clinical guidelines with major financial conflicts of interest versus clinical guidelines with minor financial conflicts of interest 2   Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.2.1 Major financial conflicts of interest 2   Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.56 [1.05, 2.33]
3.2.2 Minor financial conflicts of interest 1   Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.06 [0.68, 1.65]