Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 22;2021(4):CD013495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013495.pub2

Derubeis 2019.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: multi‐phase randomised controlled trial
Prerandomisation phases
Phase 1a: acute treatment with antidepressants (and any of the augmenting or adjunctive agents) with and without cognitive‐behavioural therapy (CBT) lasted until the patient met the criteria for remission (at least 4 consecutive weeks of minimal symptoms) (up to 19 months of treatment was allowed for remission). Results of phase 1 were reported in Hollon 2016
Phase 1b: continuation treatment with antidepressants (and any of the augmenting or adjunctive agents) with and without CBT lasted until the patient met the criteria for recovery (another 26 consecutive weeks without relapse) (up to 42 months for recovery was allowed)
Duration post randomisation: 156 weeks
Aim: to determine the effects of combining CBT with antidepressants and antidepressants alone for prevention of depressive recurrence when antidepressants were withdrawn or maintained after recovery in patients with major depressive disorder
Participants Country: USA
Setting: community adults (3 outpatient research clinics)
Type of AD: 4 different classes of antidepressants (sertraline, venlafaxine, 2 others not reported)
Duration of antidepressant treatment before randomisation: up to 42 months, mean 80.3 (40.0) weeks (reported for the combination and antidepressants alone study arms; data not separately reported for each study arm) + mean (SD) number of CBT sessions in the combination group during phase 1 was 33.3 (22.8)
Duration of antidepressant treatment post stabilisation: minimum 30 weeks
Number of participants: participants with CBT: 227 randomised to phase 1, 170 responded to phase 1, 155 randomised to RCT; participants without CBT: 225 randomised to phase 1, 148 responded to phase 1, 137 randomised to RCT
Total number of randomised participants: 155 participants with CBT (70 discontinuation, 85 antidepressant), 137 participants without CBT (69 discontinuation, 68 antidepressant)
Primary diagnosis
‐ in participants with CBT: chronic major depressive disorder: 35% discontinuation, 31% antidepressant; recurrent depression: 84% discontinuation, 89% antidepressant
‐ in participants without CBT: chronic major depressive disorder: 34% discontinuation, 50% antidepressant; recurrent depression: 88% discontinuation, 82% antidepressant previous episodes
Severity of depressive symptoms at randomisation (HDRS), mean (SD): participants with PCT: discontinuation 5.4 (3.9), antidepressant 5.8 (4.0); participants without PCT: discontinuation 6.0 (4.4), antidepressant 5.4 (4.0)
Gender distribution (F): participants with PCT: discontinuation 59%, continuation 56%; participants without PCT: discontinuation 62%, continuation 37%
Mean age, years (SD): participants with PCT: discontinuation 43.9 (11.8), antidepressant 45.6 (13.0); participants without PCT: discontinuation 43.9 (11.8), antidepressant 45.6 (13.0)
Inclusion criteria
‐ DSM‐IV major depressive disorder (MDD) either chronic (episode duration ≥ 2 years) or recurrent (with an episode in the past 3 years if only the second episode)
‐ 17‐item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS) score ≥ 14
‐ ≥ 18 years of age at entry to phase 1
‐ English speaking
‐ willing and able to provide informed consent
Patients were previously randomised in phase 1 of the clinical trial, which compared patients who received antidepressant treatment with patients who received antidepressant treatment in combination with PCT. Patients from phase 1 were eligible to participate in phase 2 if they met the criteria for recovery before the maximum allowable time (3.5 years)
Response/remission criteria: 4 consecutive weeks of LIFE Problem Symptom Rating (PSR) Scale values ≤ 2 and HDRS scores ≤ 8 for 4 consecutive weeks (with partial remission defined as LIFE PSR values ≤ 3 and HDRS scores ≤ 12 after month 12 only)
Recovery criteria: 6 consecutive months following remission without relapse (2 weeks of elevated LIFE PSR scores4 and HDRS scores14)
Exclusion criteria
‐ history of bipolar disorder or non‐affective psychosis
‐ substance dependence in the past 3 months
‐ DSM‐IV Axis I disorders requiring non‐protocol treatment
‐ DSM‐IV Axis II disorders poorly suited to study treatments (antisocial, borderline, and schizotypal)
‐ suicide risk requiring immediate hospitalisation
‐ medical condition precluding the use of study medications (including pregnancy)
‐ current medications that induce depression
‐ mandated treatment or compensation issues
Interventions Intervention 1: discontinuation of antidepressant (without placebo) and discontinuation of CBT
Tapering scheme: 4‐week period or longer if clinically indicated
Intervention 2: continuation of antidepressant (adjustment or augmentation of the medication regimen was permitted) and discontinuation of CBT
Co‐intervention: participants in both treatment groups received CBT sessions 2x weekly for at least the first 2 weeks, at least weekly thereafter during acute treatment, and then at least monthly during continuation phase and delivered by therapist. Therapists were free to vary the frequency to meet the needs of patients. Sessions were based on a treatment manual for CT of depression augmented when indicated for participants with comorbid Axis II disorders. CBT ended before entry to the discontinuation trial
Outcomes Primary outcomes
‐ estimates of the recurrence of depression. Recurrence of depression was measured by the Longitudinal Interval Follow‐up Evaluation (LIFE) (every 4 weeks for the first 12 weeks and every 12 weeks thereafter); the LIFE tool measures psychiatric status rating on a scale of 1 to 6, with score of 5 or 6 indicating the patient met DSM‐IV symptom criteria for MDD that week
Definition of relapse/recurrence
‐ 3 consecutive weeks with LIFE rating of 5 or 6 during the first 8 weeks
‐ LIFE rating of 5 or 6 for 2 consecutive weeks at any time after the first 8 weeks
Secondary outcome
Serious adverse events
Results were separated for participants with and without PCT
Notes Funding: study was supported by 3 grants from the National Institute of Mental Health; 2 pharmaceutical companies provided sertraline and venlafaxine for the trial
COI: 2 study authors received grants from the pharmaceutical industry
Note: a principle‐based algorithm was implemented that could involve up to 4 different classes of ADMs and any of the augmenting or adjunctive agents commonly used in clinical practice. Study authors did not report the 4 different classes nor the augmenting agents
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Comment: a random component is used
Quote: "random assignment to treatment was implemented using an adaptive (urn) randomisation procedure"; "adaptive randomisation algorithms for phase 2 assignment were..."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Comment: medication withdrawn was not accompanied by the use of placebo. Due to the nature of the trial (monotherapy vs combination therapy), blinding would not be possible for patients and providers
Quote: "because medication withdrawal was not accompanied by the use of placebo, phase 1 assignments were not blinded for patients or pharmacotherapists"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Comment: blinding of outcome assessment ensured; likely that blinding was successful
Quote: "interviewers who were blinded to the patients’ treatment conditions assessed patient status using the LIFE ..."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Comment: dropout rates different across groups (28.5% discontinuation group, 35.5% antidepressant group); reasons for dropout not accounted for
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: study protocol is available; predefined outcomes were not reported (types of serious adverse events). Other adverse events and withdrawal symptoms were not an outcome
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: grant from pharmaceutical industry