Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 22;2021(4):CD013495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013495.pub2

Rouillon 2000.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: multi‐phase double‐blind randomised placebo‐controlled trial
Prerandomisation phases
Phase 0: placebo washout period 4 to 7 days
Phase 1: open‐label treatment with milnacipran 2 mg bid (6 weeks)
Phase 2: open continuation treatment with milnacipran (18 weeks)
Duration post randomisation: 52 weeks
Aim: to compare the efficacy and assess the tolerability of milnacipran 50 mg bid to placebo for prevention of recurrence in depressed patients who had responded to acute treatment and had remained in remission after a 4‐month continuation phase
Participants Country: France
Setting: 104 centres
Type of AD: milnacipran
Duration of antidepressant treatment prerandomisation: 24 weeks
Duration of antidepressant treatment post stabilsation: 18 weeks
Number of participants: 500 entered phase 1, 323 entered phase 2, 227 completed phase 2 and recovered
Total number of randomised participants: 214 (104 milnacipram, 110 placebo)
Primary diagnosis: recurrent depressive disorder
Number of previous episodes (SD): placebo group 2.7 (2.3); milnacipran group 3.1 (2.3)
Severity of depressive symptoms at randomisation (HDRS), mean (SD): 4.58 (2.42) placebo, 4.77 (2.99) antidepressant
Gender distribution (F): placebo 68.2%, milnacipran 66.3%
Mean age, years (SD): placebo 44.6 (10), milnacipran 46.1 (10.2) years
Inclusion criteria
‐ 18 to 70 years of age
‐ history of MDD
‐ current major depressive episode without psychotic symptoms (DSM‐III‐R)
‐ HDRS‐21 ≥ 18 at baseline of phase 0
For entry into maintenance phase: HDRS ≤ 8, improvement or disappearance of initial symptoms, very much improved/much improved on CGI‐I
Definition of remission: HDRS ≤ 8
Exclusion criteria
Mania, hypomania, dysthymia, depression secondary to schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, alcoholism or drug addiction, suicidal intent, treatment‐resistant depression, cardiac rhythm disorders requiring antiarrhythmic treatment, kidney failure, past history of epilepsy, past history of serious allergic reaction or toxic reaction to a drug, life‐threatening disorders, abnormalities in clinical chemistry, haematology or urinalysis, pregnancy, lack of effective birth control or breastfeeding
Interventions Intervention 1: placebo
Tapering scheme: not described
Intervention 2: milnacipran 50 mg twice a day
Outcomes Recurrence, every 2 months
Defintion of recurrence: return to diagnostic criteria required for entry into the trial (depression according to DSM‐III‐R, ≥ 18 on HDRS with need to treat recurrence)
Adverse events, every 2 months
Quality of life, measured by DIP
Notes Funding: study supported by a grant from the pharmaceutical industry
COI: not reported
Mean number of previous major depressive episodes significantly lower in placebo group (2.7 (2.3)) than in milnacipran group (3.1 (2.3)); P < 0.05
Number of hospitalised patients at the moment of inclusion: 19.2% in antidepressant group and 20.7% in placebo group
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: information insufficient to permit judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: information insufficient to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: information insufficient to permit judgement
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: information insufficient to permit judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Comment: 25% (28/110) placebo and 18% (20/104) milnacipran patients discontinued for reasons other than relapse; reasons not stated
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: adverse events were reported incompletely (not separated for each treatment group; no numbers for increased sweating); withdrawal symptoms were not measured
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: grant from the pharmaceutical industry