Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 19;65(5):e02631-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02631-20

TABLE 3.

Overall performance of Etest and MTS compared to BMD for 109 S. maltophilia bloodstream isolatesa

Antimicrobial Isolate group n No. (%) with indicated value
Etest
MTS
CA VME ME MI CA VME ME MI
SXT Overall 109 107 (98) 1 (9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 107 (98) 1 (9) 0 (0) 109 (0.9)
≥R + 1 9 0 NA 0 0 NA 0
R + S 23 1 (4) 0 0 1 (4) 0 1 (4)
≤S − 1 77 NA 0 0 NA 0 0
LEV Overall 109 93 (85) 4 (9) 4 (7) 17 (16) 90 (83) 1 (5) 0 (0) 16 (15)
≥R + 2 9 0 NA 0 0 NA 0
I ± 1 40 0 1 (3) 15 (38) 1 (3) 0 14 (35)
≤I − 2 60 NA 1 (2) 2 (3) NA 0 2 (3)
MIN Overall 101 (93) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 108 (99) 0/0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
≥R + 2 0 0 NA 0 0 NA 0
I ± 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
≤I − 2 105 NA 0 8 (8) NA 0 1 (1)
CAZ Overall 109 77 (71) 13 (30) 3 (6) 16 (15) 90 (73) 4 (9) 7 (13) 19 (17)
≥R + 2 34 1 (3) NA 0 1 (3) 0 2 (6)
I ± 1 35 3 (9) 1 (3) 14 (40) 3 (9) 1 (3) 14 (40)
≤I − 2 40 NA 3 (8) 1 (3) NA 6 (15) 3 (8)
CIP (PK/PD) 109 90 (83) 0 (0) 2 (50) 17 (15) 86 (76) 2 (2) 0 (0) 21 (19)
TGC (PK/PD) 109 60 (55) 1 (2) 48 (80) 65 (60) 5 (10) 30 (65)
a

CLSI breakpoints (M100) and EUCAST PK/PD breakpoints used to interpret MIC results as indicated. Categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VMEs), major errors (MEs), and minor errors (MIs) were calculated. Errors rates for antimicrobials with no intermediate MIC category parsed as follows: ≥R + 1, MIC greater than or equal to 1 doubling dilution of the resistant breakpoint; R + S, MIC at susceptible or resistant breakpoint; and ≤S − 1, MIC less than or equal to 1 doubling dilution of the susceptible breakpoint. Errors rates for antimicrobials with intermediate MIC category parsed as follows: ≥I + 2, MIC greater than or equal to 2 doubling dilutions of the intermediate breakpoint; I ± 1, MIC plus or minus 1 doubling dilution of the intermediate breakpoint; and ≤I − 2, MIC less than or equal to 2 doubling dilutions of the intermediate breakpoint. NA, not applicable.