Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2021 Apr 1;13(4):e14238. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14238

Unilateral Degenerative Facet Joint Pathology Eliciting Rapidly Progressive Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Yasuhiro Takeshima 1,, Ai Okamoto 1, Shohei Yokoyama 1, Ichiro Nakagawa 1, Hiroyuki Nakase 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC8093117  PMID: 33959433

Abstract

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common age-related disease, but little is known concerning the impact of cervical facet degeneration in patients suffering from CSM without degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis or cervical instability. We report an instructive case of CSM with rapid neurological deterioration in which unilateral degenerative facet joint pathology at the affected spinal level and impressive radiological findings were observed.

A 70-year-old female progressively developed C5 segmental myelopathy without any trauma within a two-week period. Radiological findings revealed C3-4 spinal canal stenosis with the emergence of increased intramedullary signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, articular surface damage at the left C3-4 facet joint on computed tomography, and unilateral “facet joint gap” on cervical radiogram, but did not meet the criteria of cervical instability or spondylolisthesis.

This case suggests that some types of severe degenerative changes in cervical facet joints may contribute to cervical myelopathy, especially in cases with progressive neurological deterioration.

Keywords: cervical spine, degenerative, facet joint, laminoplasty, myelopathy, rapid deterioration, spondylosis

Introduction

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common age-related disease that worsens quality of life [1]. Cervical spondylosis that causes CSM generally results from degenerative changes in the intervertebral discs and facet joints [2]. Degenerative cervical facet joint pathology is known to be associated with neck pain and cervical radiculopathy [3]. Moreover, severe degenerative change may indicate degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS) with accompanying yellow ligament hypertrophy and facet subluxation [4]. However, little is known concerning the impact of cervical facet degeneration in patients suffering from CSM without DCS or cervical instability.

We report an instructive case of CSM with rapid neurological deterioration in which unilateral degenerative facet joint pathology at the affected spinal level and impressive radiological findings were observed.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old female had mild bilateral finger numbness due to C5-6 spinal canal stenosis that was diagnosed with cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Figures 1A, 1B). The symptomatic spinal canal stenosis had been stable for several years, but she developed right leg weakness followed by numbness of the extremities, bilateral hand clumsiness, and gait difficulty within a two-week period without a definite head or neck injury. Neurological examination revealed tetraparesis in the muscles peripheral to the deltoid, hyperreflexia below biceps brachii, and a positive Romberg test. She did not feel any pain from the neck movement. She was diagnosed with C5 segmental myelopathy. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score for cervical compression myelopathy was seven out of 17. T2-weighted MRI (T2WI) revealed developed C3-4 spinal canal stenosis with increased intramedullary signal intensity, indicating an affected spinal segmental level (Figure 1D). Axial T2WI revealed asymmetrical ligamentum flavum hypertrophy at the C3-4 level on the left side (Figures 1C, 1F). Sagittal T2WI indicated hyperintensities in the ipsilateral C3-4 facet joint, suggesting joint hypermobility (Figure 1E).

Figure 1. Preoperative T2-weighted magnetic resonance images 15 months (A–C) and just (D–F) before surgery.

Figure 1

Sagittal images demonstrate increased intramedullary signal intensity (arrow) and enlargement of the intra-articular gap in the left C3-4 facet joint (circle). Axial images indicate the emergence of asymmetrical ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (arrowheads).

Moreover, computed tomography (CT) showed articular surface damage and erosive changes in the joint without any findings of DCS at the level (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Preoperative cervical computed tomography images.

Figure 2

(A) Midline sagittal image demonstrating subaxial spondylotic changes without spinal canal stenosis or spondylolisthesis at the C3-4 level.

(B) Left paramedian sagittal image demonstrating a damaged superior articular surface of the left C4 facet joint (arrows).

(C) Coronal image demonstrating erosion of the articular surface (circle).

Dynamic lateral cervical radiography revealed C3-4 vertebral horizontal translation as 2.5 mm, which did not meet the criteria for cervical instability [5], but one of enlarged parallel shadows during extension suggested the intra-articular gap with laxation in a C3-4 facet joint (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Preoperative lateral dynamic radiographs of the cervical spine.

Figure 3

Flexion (A) and extension (B) radiographs reveal C3-4 horizontal translation as 2.5 mm and parallel shadows of the bilateral C3-4 facet joints during flexion (arrows), which enlarge markedly during extension (arrowheads).

Cervical laminoplasty without fusion was performed immediately, and her JOA score improved to 11. She was immobilized with cervical collar for six weeks after the operation. Postoperative sagittal T2WI at six months showed resolution of hyperintensities in the left C3-4 facet joint (Figure 4A). Dynamic lateral radiography 12 months after the surgery at the last follow-up showed unchanged C3-4 vertebral body translation and decrease in the size of shadows on the affected facet joint (Figures 4B, 4C).

Figure 4. Postoperative cervical radiological images.

Figure 4

(A) Left paramedian sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating the disappearance of interarticular fluid intensities in the C3-4 facet joint (dashed circle).

(B, C) Dynamic radiographs showing unchanged C3-4 vertebral body translation and smaller facet joint shadows during extension compared with preoperative images (arrowheads).

Discussion

Intervertebral discs and facet joints are important for biomechanical shifting of stress on the cervical spine and mobility [3]. Therefore, age-related degeneration, called cervical spondylosis, sometimes indicates clinical issues. It is well known that cervical facet degeneration may indicate not only radiculopathy due to foraminal spinal stenosis [6] but myelopathy in the setting of DCS or cervical instability due to spinal canal stenosis [7]. However, little is known concerning the impact of cervical facet degeneration in patients suffering from CSM without DCS or cervical instability. One reason might be because it is sometimes more difficult to determine the actual affected spinal segment in CSM patients without DCS or cervical instability. It is quite common for patients with symptomatic CSM to have multilevel spinal canal stenosis on radiological examination; false-positive or asymptomatic spinal degeneration is not unusual [8], especially in elderly patients. In the present case, it was fortunately easy to determine the actual affected spinal segment. First, neurological findings clearly indicated C5 myelopathy. Second, because serial radiological imaging was performed for a long time preoperatively, it was possible to detect the true pathological lesion based on temporal and quantitative changes.

In the present case, several impressive radiological findings were observed at the affected spinal level: unilateral facet degeneration with intra-articular T2WI hyperintensities, ipsilateral ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, and a unilateral “facet joint opening” sign. In general, DCS is frequently accompanied by yellow ligament hypertrophy and facet arthropathy and subluxation [4]. Therefore, it is easy to speculate in the present case that hypermobility of the affected cervical facet joint indicates ipsilateral ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and cervical myelopathy. The emergence of increased intramedullary signal intensity on T2WI would support this hypothesis.

Cervical facet joints play key roles in static stability and gliding cervical motion. Therefore, impairment of these joints might negatively impact dynamic cervical motion, ultimately resulting in DCS or presentation of instability at the spinal level [4]. In the present case, without any findings of DCS, dynamic lateral radiography findings did not meet the criteria for cervical instability [5], but a unilateral “facet joint gap” sign was clearly observed. This finding suggests that unilateral facet joint impairment could induce cervical myelopathy due to potential hypermobility of the affected facet joint. Therefore, the “facet joint gap” sign may be a useful indicator of pathological CSM due to facet joint potential laxation. Cervical facet joint has attracted less attention until now in the clinical setting without DCS or instability. In the present case, articular surface damage with erosive changes in the affected cervical facet joint was also observed on CT scan. Therefore, further research of qualitative assessments for cervical facet joint using CT scans may be useful in CSM patients, especially in the situation with rapid neurological deterioration.

For the surgical treatment of CSM, not only decompression of the spinal cord but spinal stabilization should be recommended if dynamic factor was involved as the mechanism of clinical progression. On the other hand, there is a report of open-door laminoplasty for elderly CSM patients, indicating that the range of motion (ROM) of all cervical spines was significantly limited after the operation, and there was no significant difference in the clinical results between the presence and absence of DCS [9]. In the present case, cervical laminoplasty without fusion was conducted because of her lowered activities of daily living and the absence of radiological findings of cervical instability, and because postoperative cervical horizontal dynamic translation of the vertebrae was not aggravated. In addition, postoperative radiological findings revealed resolution of hyperintensities in the left facet joint on T2WI and a decrease in the size of “facet joint opening” sign on cervical radiographs. These results may be supported by the speculation that postoperative limitation of ROM of all cervical spines after open-door laminoplasty for elderly patients might restrict the pathological facet joint hypermobility.

Conclusions

This illustrative case suggested that cervical facet joint degeneration might be associated with rapidly progressive myelopathy in the absence of marked cervical instability. Dynamic lateral radiography is insufficient for the assessment of cervical facet joint degeneration, but the “facet joint gap” sign may be a potential indicator of pathological CSM.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Current diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Bakhsheshian J, Mehta VA, Liu JC. Global Spine J. 2017;7:572–586. doi: 10.1177/2192568217699208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a spectrum of related disorders affecting the aging spine. Tetreault L, Goldstein CL, Arnold P, Harrop J, Hilibrand A, Nouri A, Fehlings MG. Neurosurgery. 2015;77:51–67. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cervical spondylosis anatomy: pathophysiology and biomechanics. Shedid D, Benzel EC. Neurosurgery. 2007;60:7–13. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000215430.86569.C4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:675–693. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine. White AA 3rd, Johnson RM, Panjabi MM, Southwick WO. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;109:85–96. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197506000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.A novel technique for cervical facet joint hyperplasia-spondylotic radiculopathy by laminar and lateral mass screw cofixations. Sheng SR, Wang K, Nisar M, Chen JX, Wu AM, Wang XY. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:490–495. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Does spondylolisthesis affect severity and outcome of degenerative cervical myelopathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis [Online ahead of print] Gondar R, Nouri A, Jannelli G, Schaller K, Tessitore E. Global Spine J. 2020 doi: 10.1177/2192568220960452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: natural course and the value of diagnostic techniques-WFNS Spine Committee recommendations. Zileli M, Borkar SA, Sinha S, et al. Neurospine. 2019;16:386–402. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938240.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not influence surgical results of laminoplasty in elderly cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients. Shigematsu H, Ueda Y, Takeshima T, et al. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:720–725. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1338-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES