Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 8;2021(2):CD008274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008274.pub4

Cohen 1991.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: parallel, cluster‐randomised
Date: not stated
Duration: 12 months
Number of study centres: 1

Setting: model family practice unit (Pittsburgh), USA
Participants Who participated: 30 hypertensive and obese people stratified by residents (residents, not participants, were randomised to intervention or control group)
Main inclusion criteria: age 20 to 75 years; BMI ≥ 28 kg/m(men); ≥ 27 kg/m(women); SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg, DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg in 2 or more readings
Main exclusion criteria: not described in detail
Subgroup analyses: weight losers vs weight gainer
Interventions Dietary intervention: physicians (n = 10) were taught by a behavioural psychologist; the goal of the dietary advice was to reduce the caloric content of the diet without radically changing the participant's lifestyle; monthly participant consultations and reviewing diet history sheet; the suggested diets were not specifically intended to be salt‐reducing (N = 15)
No dietary intervention: physicians (n = 8) received no special instructions or materials; the participants continued to be treated with their usual care (N = 15)
Additional treatment: ‐
Outcomes Primary outcomes:
1. Mortality: ‐
2. Cardiovascular morbidity: ‐
3. Adverse events: ‐ 
Secondary outcomes:
1. Changes in systolic blood pressure [mm Hg]: ‐
2. Changes in diastolic blood pressure [mm Hg]: ‐
3. Changes in body weight [kg]:
Definition: body weight change from baseline to 6 months, from baseline to 12 months, and from 6 months to 12 months
Additional outcome measured in the trial:
1. Mean arterial blood pressure change in mm Hg
2. Change in number of antihypertensive medications
3. Number of visits
Study details Length of follow‐up: 12 months
Trial terminated before regular end (for benefit / because of adverse events): No
Trial ID:
Publication details Language of publication: English
Funding:
Publication status: Full‐text journal publication
Study aim Quote from publication: "...to determine whether this was an effective milieu for the treatment of hypertension by weight reduction using a low‐technology low‐cost approach and involving only the physician as the therapeutic medium."
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Comment: No details on sequence generation are provided; stratified randomisation of investigators instead of participants with very small cluster size
Quote: "The residents were stratified by residency year and randomly assigned to either control or experimental groups. ... The experimental or control status of a patient was determined by the status of the physician, and great care was taken to avoid contamination."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: Method of concealment is not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Total mortality Unclear risk Comment: Outcome not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Cardiovascular morbidity Unclear risk Comment: Outcome not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Adverse events Unclear risk Comment: Outcome not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Change in blood pressure High risk Comment: Since the physicians assigned to the experimental group were taught about the weight‐reducing programme, knowledge of the allocation intervention was not prevented during study
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Change in body weight High risk Comment: Since the physicians assigned to the experimental group were taught about the weight‐reducing programme, knowledge of the allocation intervention was not prevented during study
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Total mortality Unclear risk Comment: Outcome not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Cardiovascular morbidity Unclear risk Comment: Outcome not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Adverse events Unclear risk Comment: Outcome not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Change in blood pressure Low risk Comment: no withdrawals; all participants were analysed
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Change in body weight Low risk Comment: No withdrawals; all participants were analysed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: No study protocol available; no primary and secondary outcomes were defined in the publication
Other bias Low risk Comment: Non detected