Table 1.
Patients’ coverage in the International ERAS® Interactive Audit System (EIAS) database stratified by hospital
| No | Unit name | Number of patients registered in the EIAS | Number of patients not registered in the EIAS | Coverage, % | Coveragea, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospitals with converting key | |||||
| 1 | Ersta Hospital | 198 | 3 | 98.5 | 98.5 |
| 2 | Lidköping Hospital | 93 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| 3 | Karlstad Hospital | 198 | 5 | 97.5 | 98.0 |
| 4 | St. Göran Hospital | 166 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| 5 | NUS Umeå | 100 | 4 | 96.2 | 97.1 |
| 6 | Skövde Hospital | 126 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| 7 | Danderyd Hospital | 269 | 7 | 97.5 | 100.0 |
| 8 | Örebro Hospital | 151 | 8 | 96.0 | 96.2 |
| Total | 1301 | 27 | 98.0 | 98.8 | |
| Hospitals without converting key | |||||
| 1 | Västerås Hospital | 88 | 8 | 91.7 | – |
| 2 | Östersund Hospital | 63 | 21 | 75.0 | – |
| 3 | Sahlgrenska Östra Hospital | 441 | 95 | 82.3 | – |
| 4 | NU–Sjukvården Näl Hospital | 219 | 0 | 100.0 | – |
| Total | 811 | 124 | 86.7 | – | |
Some hospitals did not register in EIAS certain elective colorectal surgeries due to hospital-specific inclusion/exclusion criteria (small bowel resection (one case for Karlstad hospital, one case for NUS Umeå, and one case for Danderyd Hospital), patients with iliopsoas abscess (one case for Örebro Hospital), and patients with rectal prolapse (one case for Örebro Hospital) were not registered. Danderyd Hospital did not record reversal of Hartman or other stoma down procedures (n = 6).)
ERAS Enhanced recovery after surgery
aCoverage rate when patients omitted due to hospital-specific exclusion criteria are not counted