Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 10;51(3):279–288. doi: 10.1007/s10519-020-10033-9

Table 3.

Effects of violating assumptions on parameter estimates

Assumption Models Violation Typical biases if assumption violated
Overestimated Underestimated
No residual stratification 0, 1, 2 Residual strat VF, w, v
No G×Age (δo=δ) 0, 1, 2 δo>δ VPGS, VLGS VF
fp=fm 0, 1, 2 fpfm VF
No dominance effects 0, 1, 2 Dominance effects Vϵ
No epistasis 0, 1, 2 Epistasis Vϵ(0,1), VLGS(2) VF(2), v(2)
rPGS,t02=ht02 0, 1 rPGS,t02<ht02 VF, w (when AM)
a^2=a2 2-NP a^2<a2 VF, v VLGS
gδ=ha 2 gδ>ha VLGS VF, v
wδ=va 2 wδ<va VF, v VLGS
μ=0 0 μ>0 VF, VPGS, w
Eq. AM 1e, 2e Diseq. AM VLGS(2e), VF(1e), w(1e) VF(2e), VPGS(2e), w(2e), v(2e)
Diseq. AM 1d, 2d Eq. AM VF, VPGS(2d) VPGS(1d)
No social homogamy 1, 2 Social homog. VLGS, VPGS (2) VF, w, v
No genetic homogamy 1, 2 Genetic homog. VF, w, v VLGS, VPGS