Table 2.

Comparison between different LVA patterns

	LVA ( +) n = 76	LVA (–) n = 64	p	Severe LVA ( +) n = 20	Severe LVA (–) n = 120	p	Disseminated LVA pattern ( +) n = 40	Disseminated LVA pattern (–) n = 100	p
LAA peak inflow velocity	0.34 (0.26–0.49)	0.4 (0.31–0.58)	.032	0.29 (0.17–0.39)	0.39 (0.3–0.57)	.005	0.35 (0.23–0.57)	0.38 (0.3–0.55)	.29
LAA peak outflow velocity	0.4 (0.28–0.56)	0.46 (0.37–0.69)	.052	0.28 (0.20–0.36)	0.47 (0.35–0.62)	.0002	0.32(0.23–0.57)	0.45 (0.36–0.6)	.053
LAA low peak inflow velocity	8 (9%)	6 (9%)	.958	4 (20%)	10 (8%)	.0257	5 (13%)	9 (9%)	.41
LAA low peak outflow velocity	5 (7%)	1 (2%)	.190	5 (25%)	1 (1%)	.0006	4 (10%)	2 (2%)	.68
LAA depth	27 (24–31)	29 (25–31)	.5	28 (23–31)	29 (24–31)	.66	29 (23–31)	28.5 (24.30)	.94
RAA AFCL	160 (150–174)	155 (140–170)	.070	165 (150–175)	160 (143–170)	.176	160 (150–175)	160 (145–170)	.19
LAA AFCL	150 (138–163)	140 (133–150)	.086	155 (145–180)	140 (135–150)	.006	150 (140–165)	140 (132–150)	.01
Total AFCL	155 (145–165)	150 (140–160)	.049	160 (150–185)	150 (140–161)	.02	160 (147–172)	150 (140–160)	.02
AFCL gradient	0.93 (0.85–1)	0.93 (0.83–1)	.9	0.97 (0.87–1)	0.93 (0.83–1)	.157	0.97 (0.87–1)	0.92 (0.84–1)	.18
RAA AFCL > LAA AFCL	12 (16%)	11 (18%)	.794	5 (25%)	18 (15%)	.147	8 (20%)	15 (15%)	.9
RAA AFCL < LAA AFCL	49 (65%)	36 (56%)	.338	10 (50%)	75 (63%)	.256	19 (48%)	66 (66%)	.17
RAA AFCL = LAA AFCL	15 (19%)	17 (26%)	.372	6 (30%)	26 (22%)	.736	10 (25%)	22 (22%)	.7

Bold values indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05

LVA low-voltage areas. Other abbreviations as in Table 1