Table 2.
Patient baseline characteristics by age group
| Age, years | n | Sex | Racea | Tumor type | ECOG PS scoreb | Median body weight, kg (range) | Median BSA, m2 (range) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | F | Asian | Non-Asian | GIST | Other | 0 | > 0 | ||||
| 2–5 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 18.3 (16.2–28.7) | 0.7 (0.7–1.0) |
| 6–11 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 20 | 8 | 4 | 28.4 (17.1–56.3) | 1.1 (0.7–1.5) |
| 12–17 | 33 | 17 | 16 | 2 | 30 | 6 | 27 | 18 | 15 | 56 (37.1–100) | 1.6 (1.3–2.1) |
| 18–21 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 71.2 (62.5–74.5) | 1.9 (1.6–1.9) |
| Total 6–17 | 53 | 26 | 27 | 2 | 48 | 6 | 47 | 26 | 19 | 49.1 (17.1–100) | 1.4 (0.7–2.1) |
| Total 2–21 | 65 | 32 | 33 | 4 | 58 | 6 | 59 | 29 | 25 | 49.1 (16.2–100) | 1.4 (0.7–2.1) |
ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, F female, GIST gastrointestinal stromal tumor, M male
aRace was unknown for three patients
bECOG PS scores based on either the ECOG PS score or extrapolated from the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale, with ECOG PS scores set to 0 and 1 for Karnofsky Performance Status Scales > 90 and ≤ 90, respectively. The ECOG PS score could not be determined for 11 patients