Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 14;46(3):343–352. doi: 10.1007/s13318-021-00671-7

Table 2.

Patient baseline characteristics by age group

Age, years n Sex Racea Tumor type ECOG PS scoreb Median body weight, kg (range) Median BSA, m2 (range)
M F Asian Non-Asian GIST Other 0 > 0
2–5 6 3 3 1 5 0 6 2 1 18.3 (16.2–28.7) 0.7 (0.7–1.0)
6–11 20 9 11 0 18 0 20 8 4 28.4 (17.1–56.3) 1.1 (0.7–1.5)
12–17 33 17 16 2 30 6 27 18 15 56 (37.1–100) 1.6 (1.3–2.1)
18–21 6 3 3 1 5 0 6 1 5 71.2 (62.5–74.5) 1.9 (1.6–1.9)
Total 6–17 53 26 27 2 48 6 47 26 19 49.1 (17.1–100) 1.4 (0.7–2.1)
Total 2–21 65 32 33 4 58 6 59 29 25 49.1 (16.2–100) 1.4 (0.7–2.1)

ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, F female, GIST gastrointestinal stromal tumor, M male

aRace was unknown for three patients

bECOG PS scores based on either the ECOG PS score or extrapolated from the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale, with ECOG PS scores set to 0 and 1 for Karnofsky Performance Status Scales > 90 and ≤ 90, respectively. The ECOG PS score could not be determined for 11 patients